论裁判文书上网与审判公开.docxVIP

论裁判文书上网与审判公开 摘 要 裁判文书上网属于裁判文书公开的范畴，是审判公开原则在阳光司法进程中具体化的重要内容，系统研究裁判文书上网的一系列问题，有助于深化司法改革、促进审判公开等工作。裁判文书上网公开在统一裁判尺度，提升法官司法技能，规范社会公众行为，促进社会诚信体系建设，形成法律智力资源库方面都具有重要价值。 本文开篇首先论述裁判文书上网公开的理论基础，着重从三个角度进行论述，分别是裁判公开与裁判文书上网公开、司法透明与公民的知情权以及审判公开，意在厘清裁判文书上网公开与审判公开之间的关系。 本文第二部分主要介绍了我国裁判文书公开的现状及所存在的问题，如缺乏证据分析、说理不充分、制度缺陷等，然后依据对其他国家或地区关于裁判文书上网方面的践行经验的介绍，旨在引以为鉴，为完善我国的裁判文书上网，促进审判公开公正，寻找合适的路径。 本文第三部分紧接着对我国的裁判文书现状提出所存在的问题，并针对现实问题寻找完善的方案和提出建议。主要方案如强化裁判文书中的证据分析，完善裁判文书说理的公开，加强裁判文书上网公开的制度保障等等。 最后，得出本文的结论，裁判文书上网公开任重而道远，需要多方共同努力，在日益重视法治的当今社会，在信息化日趋先进的时代，裁判文书上网公开在塑造司法公信力及司法权威方面将会产生不可低估的影响。 关键词： 裁判文书上网 裁判公开 审判公开 审判公正 STUDY ON LEGAL DOCUMENTS’ INTERNET OPENNESE AND JUDICIAL OPENNESE ABSTRACT Internet referee instruments are within the scope of the judgment document open, public trial is a judicial process in the sun principle embodied an important part of the system of Internet research instruments referee theoretical and practical experience, to continue to promote a far-reaching public judgment document. Judgment Documents disclosed in the consolidated referee Internet scale, enhance the skills of Judges, regulate public behavior and promote social credit system, the formation of the law of intellectual resource base are of great value. This paper first discusses the theoretical basis of the referee begins instruments disclosed in the Internet, mainly from three perspectives discussed, namely the referee and the referee publicly disclosed online documents, judicial transparency and citizens right to information and open trial, intended to clarify the judgment document access and public trial the relationship between the public. The second part introduces the situation and the problems of Judgment Document disclosure, such as lack of evidence analysis, reasoning is insufficient, the system defects, and then based on the introduction of other countries practice experience on the Internet aspect of the judgment document designed to draw lessons for the improvement of our judgment document access,