罗伯特·米歇尔斯政党思想评析-国际政治专业毕业论文.docxVIP

law of oligarchy thesis of Michels. As organizations (including political parties) come into being the increasingly large-scale, specialized division of labor makes the representative essential. In this case, only the person with higher qualifications could be capable of the complicated things in the organizations, the Mass’s own indifference and incompetence, as well as the psychological desire to be led make leaders outstanding from them. Therefore, there the gap between the leaders and the Mass comes to appear, and then be enlarged greater. Soon afterwards driven by the desire for power, the leaders works hard to secure their own status, As a result, organizations have become increasingly conservative, the tendency of oligarchy clearly be found out. In the third part of the paper, the author discusses Michels’ several insights on the socialist parties. According to Michels, where the socialist parties also have a tendency to sit on the parliamentary elections, at the same time, with the growing strength of the socialist parties, the independent tendency of their parliamentary group has become increasingly evident; Although centralized tendency and de-centralized tendency both exists in the social parties, the latter while avoiding the formation of a single gigantic oligarchy, it eventually results in the emergence of a number of individual oligarchic mechanisms; Again Michels has also made a detailed analysis about the advantages of the socialist political party leaders; Lastly, the socialist party leaders, with their own advantages to come to the fore from the general population, however, the struggle within leader groups has continued from time to time. Although in most occasions, the older leaders often to be defeated to an end, the final outcome of the struggle is that the older and the new leaders, after some reunions, will share party powers. In the fourth part of the part, the author also shows Michels’ analysis about the attempts to restrict the influe