行为金融学入门 井泽教授lecture 3 axiomatic systems of the expected资料.pptVIP

行为金融学入门 井泽教授lecture 3 axiomatic systems of the expected资料.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共35页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
行为金融学入门 井泽教授lecture 3 axiomatic systems of the expected资料

Axiomatic Systems of the Expected Utility Theory The Expected utility theory was proposed by Bernoulli (1738) ,Ramsey (1931) , von Neumann-Morgenstern (1947) and fully developed by Savage (1954). in which choice over subjectively uncertain prospects is characterized by expected utility risk preferences and standard probabilistic beliefs. The difference of these earlier studies and Ramsey is the manner which represents uncertainty. In the earlier studies, the objective framework, uncertainty comes prepackaged in terms of numerical probabilities. On the other hand, Ramsey treats the choice of probability distributions over outcomes or lotteries A similar and relatively simple formulation, that provides insights into the most important assumptions of expected utility for statistical purposes, was proposed by Anscombe and Aumann (1963). The Expected Utility Maximization Theorem (Savage,1954) Sure-Thing Principle is also called the ‘strong independence assumption’. It states that if outcome x and outcome x′ are indifferent in themselves, then for any outcome y, a probability mix of x and y must be indifferent to a probability mix of x′ and y. Denying the principle is a possible response to the Allais paradox. Sure-Thing Principle Possible Decisions: Take w. ([w]) Refuse w, and take x if tails. (.5[x]+.5[z]) Refuse w, and take y if tails. (.5[y]+.5[z]) suppose an individual would prefer x over y, but he would also prefer .5[y] + .5[z] over .5[x] + .5[z], in violation of substitution. Suppose that w is some other prize that he would consider better than .5[x] + .5[z] and worse than .5[y] + .5[z]. That is, x y but .5[y] + .5[z] [w] .5[x] + .5[z]. Therefore, the third strategy would be best. However, if she/he takes the third strategy, and the coin comes up Tails, then she/he would choose x! That is actually end up with the second strategy , which is worst. Roger B. Myerson, Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict,1997. Why we need Sure-Thing Principle? A Brief Proof

文档评论(0)

robert118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档