论刑事诉讼中的证据裁判原则-诉讼法学专业论文.docx

内容摘要现代世界各国已经在其刑事诉讼法律或法律实践中普遍确立了证据裁判原 内容摘要 现代世界各国已经在其刑事诉讼法律或法律实践中普遍确立了证据裁判原 则，而我国刑事诉讼法律制度却尚未确立这一原则。不仅如此，学界对证据裁判 原则的含义也并不一致，笔者认为刑事诉讼中的证据裁判原则应当包括以下含 义：对事实问题的认定，应当依据具有证据能力且经过合法程序调查的证据；没 有相关证据，不得认定相关事实。证据裁判原则经历从古代弹劾式诉讼模式下的 朦胧的证据裁判原则精神，到纠问式诉讼模式下的证据裁判原则的初步形成，再 到辩论式诉讼模式下的逐步完善的发展过程。这一过程，体现了人们对刑事诉讼 保障人权目的和正当程序独立价值等认识的逐步深刻，也体现了人类理性发展的 进步。正确认识证据裁判原则需要对证据和证据能力进行重新的审视，证据裁判 的主体只能是法官，裁判的范围不仅包括实体法事实，也包括程序法事实，但并 不包括所有的事实，推定、司法认知、自认的事实则可以作为证据裁判原则的例 外，此外还需要厘清证据裁判原则与证明标准、证明责任、证明方法等问题的关 系。就价值而言，证据裁判原则体现了公正、效益等价值，而在刑事诉讼中确立 证据裁判原则则需要从刑事诉讼制度和证据规则两方面着力。我国的刑事诉讼制 度在许多方面体现了证据裁判原则的要求，但并未真正确立这一原则，尚有很多 不足之处。证据裁判原则的确立需要针对这些不足之处进行不断地完善。 关键词：证据裁判证据证据能力 AbstractThe Abstract The modern various countries has already establ ished the evidence referee principle general ly in its criminal prosecution law or in the legal pract ice，but in our country criminal prosecution legal regime has not yet established this principle actually．Not only that，the educational world is also inconsistent to the meaning of the evidence referee principle．The author thought the evidence referee principle must include the following two meanings in the criminal prosecution．First， recognizing the facts must rest on the evidence with evidence abi 1 ity that has already passed through the legal program investigation． Second， we can’t recognize the related facts without the connected evidence．The evidence referee principle experienced from the dim evidence referee principle spiri t in ancient impeachable lawsuit pattern to the preliminary formation of the evidence referee principle in the inquisitional proceedings， and then to the gradually consummation developing process in the adversary proceeding．This process manifested the people’S understanding of the goal to safeguarding human rights and the independent value of the due process in the criminal prosecution has developed gradually and profoundly，and also has manifested the progress in the human rationality development． In order to understanding the evidence refe