两《戴记》考论-中国古代文学专业论文.docxVIP

摘 摘 要 本文主要研究两《戴记》与中国古代文学的关系。首先考察了两《戴记》的性 质，即两《戴记》的编撰情况，以及两者的关系，认为《小戴礼记》成于后仓之手，《大 戴礼记》由戴德编成于汉宣帝五风三年以前。两《戴记》不存在谁删谁的问题。戴德 根据自己作为信都王太博的需要所编《礼记》虽有一部分与《小戴礼记》重合，但二 者所据母本同少异多，故考察两《戴记》时应同等看待二者。在此基础上，本文进一 步论述了两《戴记》对中国古代文学的贡献和影响，认为《夏小正》对自然进入文学 领域有过特殊贡献；两《戴记》哲理化自然审美倾向有其不可抹灭的价值；两《戴 记》对人的研究促进了文学对人的发现，促进了作家自我意识的觉醒，对人格力量 的关注。两《戴记》对文学作品的内容，包括取材、情节、主题都有深层次的影响，对 文学作品体裁的成熟也有促进作用，两《戴记》还深刻影响了中国古代文学批评。 这种影响可以概括为声、色、气、味诸方面，其中关于“气”的学说影响最为显著。 AbstractThis Abstract This thesis probes into the study of the relation between two Dai ji and Chi— nese classic literature．At first，author observes and investigates the nature of these two books，Which inelud tile facts about their editors and tile contact be— tween them．From this author gets conclusions that though Da Dai Li ji was edited by Dai De before the year of Wu Feng three，(53BC)but Xiao Dai Li ji was edited by Hou Cang who was t he teacher of two Dai．and there is no possi— bility that none of these two books was edeted by deleting the other．Therefore， We should regard them as importance as equal，even when there is overlap be— tween these tWO books，because most of works in them came from different 0一 riginal editions．Bases on these studies．author reserches the influence and con— tribution of these two books to Chinese classic literature，from which he gets fol— lowing conclusions：Xia Xiao Zheng acqures its unique position in tile history tile nature go into literary kingdom．The aesthetic Value of two Dai ji Will never be bloted out．The sutdies of human nature in these two books promoted literature to discover the literary character as well as to writer to find out himself and pay attention to persenal power．Two Dai ji deeply influenced the content of litera— ture．Which inelud the material，the plot，the theme and the style．1iterary criti— cism was alse effeeted by ideas that can be generalized from four aspects as sound，Colour，spell and taste，especially the most obvious one．the third——Qi． 绪 绪 论 两《戴记》考论 绪 论 《庄子·天运》说：“孔子谓老聃日：‘丘治《诗》、《书》、《礼》、《乐》、《易》