论诉讼欺诈及其刑法调整-刑法学专业论文.docxVIP

通证人提出伪造的证据，提起虚假的诉讼或者在诉讼中提出虚假的请求，意图使 通证人提出伪造的证据，提起虚假的诉讼或者在诉讼中提出虚假的请求，意图使 法院产生错误的判断进而做出有利于自己的判决，使被害人交付财物或财产性利 益，或由法院通过强制执行将被害人的财产转移给行为人或第三人所有的行为。 箱二部分：诉讼欺诈行为定性的理论与实践。在这一部分中，笔者先介绍了 外国对诉讼欺诈行为定性的相关规定及司法实践，之后介绍了我国法学界关于诉 讼欺诈行为定性的三种主要观点：诉讼欺诈无罪论、诉讼欺诈有罪论和诉讼欺诈 法律完善论。 第三部分：诉讼欺诈的刑法分析。本部分首先对我国诈骗罪传统理论进行检 讨，试图将三角诈骗的概念引入到我国刑法理论中，然后又对诉讼欺诈行为和诈 骗罪从犯罪构成角度进行分析比较。之后对将诉讼欺诈定性为敲诈勒索罪的观点 进行批判，认为诉讼欺诈不构成敲诈勒索罪，并论证最高检的《答复》无法调整 诉讼欺诈行为。 第四部分：诉讼欺诈刑法调整途径的探索。这部分对我国诉讼欺诈行为定性 的两种途径，即以诈骗罪认定和增设新罪名，进行比较分析。据此笔者提出自己 的观点：对于诉讼欺诈行为可以纳入现行刑法的诈骗罪中进行调整，并对诉讼欺 诈的着手、既遂未遂、犯罪数额和犯罪竞合等问题进行了讨论。 [关键词]诉讼欺诈三角诈骗诈骗罪 Study Study 011 LitigatiOR Fraud and Or imi na ContrO J thereof (Abstract for Dissertation of L．L．M Degree) Major：Criminal Law SpecializaLion：Chinese Criminal law and Economic Criminal Law Author：Zheng Wei Prof．Xue Jinzhan Although two traditional conceps which include“avoid litigation” and“abomJ hate litigation”have being rooted in the minds of most of Chinese populace for long time，the ru]e of 1aw has become increasingly accepted and advocated in nowadays，1itigation fraud iS increasingly occurred nationwide More and more such litigation fraud cases have been reported in some nationally known media，SOrtie of which cases invovle startling amount and occasion serious social influence．In contrast， litigation fraud is widely recognized to be beyond the control scope of Civil Procedural Law：and no direct corresponding provision in the currently appliable Criminal Law of the P．R．C．cao be app]ied tosuch kind Litigation Fraud pursuant to the principle of Legality，therefore，in criminial practice，the disposal of 1itigation fraud differ from one to another．Notwithstanding it arouses the greate interest of theorists’ in a recent time and a handful papers 0n such issues have been published， unfortunately no systematical research result in relation to such issue has been seen upto now．So it iS no wonder that no unamous opinion has been formed．Aceodiingly，this paper is determined to elaborate on and address such disputed issae by