论民事执行中案外人救济制度的完善-法律专业论文.docx

论民事执行中案外人救济制度的完善摘 论民事执行中案外人救济制度的完善 摘 要 正所谓“有权利就有救济，民事执行中的案外人救济，是指案外人的合 法权利因执行机关的执行行为而受到侵害时，所设立的一种救济方法。我国 现行《民事诉讼法》第204条规定了案外人异议和案外人异议之诉两种救济 制度。但是与西方法治国家和我国台湾地区相比，我国的案外人救济制度规 定得还是较为粗糙和简单，操作性不强，使得这一制度在运行中出现诸多问 题，如提起案外人救济的具体行为规定的过于模糊，异议审查机构不明确和 缺乏规范性，案外人诉讼救济制度的范围不明确，前置程序存在弊端等。鉴 于我国民事执行中的案外人救济制度存在这些问题，当务之急就是重构这一 制度。本文从民事执行中的案外人救济制度的概念入手，对德国、日本和我 国台湾地区案外人救济制度的立法状况进行比较研究，针对我国目前民事执 行中的案外人异议制度存在的问题，提出了一些完善的建议。案外人异议制 度的完善对维护案外人和执行当事人的合法权益具有十分重要的现实意义。 关键词：案外人救济制度，案外人异议，异议之诉，程序正义、诉讼效率 oN oN IMPRoVING THE SYSTEM oF PRoVIDING REMEDY FoR PERSONS OTHER THAN INVoIⅣED IN THE CASE IN CIVIL EXECUTIoN Abstract Remedy is available as long as there is a fight．The remedy for persons other than involved in the case in civil execution refers to a kind of remedy provided when the lawful rights of persons other than involved in the case are infringed upon by the execution of the executive agency．In Article 204 of the Civil Procedural Law of the People’S Republic of China，two systems of remedy, including the opposition of persons other than involved in the case and the action for the opposition of persons other than involved in the case，are stipulated． However,the stipulation concerning the system of providing remedy for persons other than involved in the case has some problems in application．It is very rough， simple and impractical．To be concrete，the stipulation concerning the concrete practices for providing remedy for persons other than involved in the case is too ambiguous；the agency for examining the opposition is not specific and lack of standards；the scope of the system for providing remedy for persons other than involved in the case is unclear；and the pre-procedures have deficiencies，etc． Owing to these factors，it is urgent to reconstruct the system in China．The thesis begins begins with the concept of the system of providing remedy for persons other than involved in the case in civil execution，makes a comparative study on the legislation of the system in Germany,Japan and Taiwan，an