益气健脾、化瘀解毒方合FOLFOX方案化疗治疗术后大肠癌的临床研究.pdfVIP

to was differencebetweenthemin significant 13．1士9．1ng／m1．There from to TheCEAvalueofcontrastincreased group 18．5土23．3ng／ml84．1土220．2ng／ml， Therewasno differencebetweenthemin CAl99 significant statistics(pO．05)．The valueofcontrastincreasedfrom to group 128．9士254．5n∥ml betweenthemin resultindicated wasno difference statistics(p0．05)．This significant in contrast reactionswerealso thatthecancer didn’t the symbol improve group．Bad of were differencesinthe ofdecrease tested，there aspects leucocytes， significant andincreaceof whereastheother were andvomit．diarrhoea AUj aspects queasiness of were notdifferent indicatedthatthebadreactionsthetest significantly．This group thanthecontrast thelife ofthetest was significantlylighter group，andquality group more thanthecontrast improved group． of tO the and Conclusion：Themethod reinforcingQi strengthenspleen with toremovebloodstasiscombinedthe bloodcirculation promoting FOLFOXtocBrecorectal withthesole of