剑桥11 T2 S3+4听力文本.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
剑桥11T2S34听力文本

Now when we get to our findings I thought we could divide them up into the different zones we identified on the shore and the problems organisms face in each zone. So for the highest area..... The splash zone? Yeah, we found mostly those tiny shellfish that have strong hard shells that act as protection. But not from other organisms that might eat them, predators? No, thats not the main danger for them. But the shells prevent them from drying out because theyre in the open air for most of the time. Right. And since theyre exposed, they need to be able to find some sort of shelter, or cover themselves up, so they dont get too hot. Then in the middle and lower zones, nearer the sea, we need to discuss the effects of wave action... Yes, and how organisms develop structures to prevent themselves from being swept away, or even destroyed by being smashed against the rocks. I havent done anything on the geological changes. I dont know what to put for that. No, we werent concentrating on that. Maybe we need to find some websites. Good idea. Ive got the lecture notes from Mr. Blakes geology course, but theyre too general. But we could ask him which books on our Reading List might be most helpful. Right. OK, now I did a draft of the section of sources of possible error in our research, but I dont know if you agree. For example, the size of the sample, and whether its big enough to make any general conclusions from. But I thought actually we did have quite a big sample. We did. And our general method of observation seemed quite reliable. But we might not be all that accurate as far as the actual numbers go. Yeah, we might have missed some organisms — if they were hiding under a rock for example. I wasnt sure about the way we described their habitats. I decided it was probably OK. Yeah, and the descriptions we gave of the smaller organisms, they werent very detailed, but they were adequate in this context. Im not sure we identified all the species correctly though. OK, wed bett

文档评论(0)

baoyue + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档