F4_exam_technique英文学习资料 .pdfVIP

ACCA Exam Technique Articles OpenT ACCA F4 Exam technique (seealsotheseconongeneralexamtechnique) Alwaysremember,thisisalawexamforaccountants,notalawexamforlawyers.Itisintendedby ACCAthatstudentsshouldappreciatethatcompanylaw,thelawoftransacons,employmentlaw, thelawoftortandpartnershiplawisgovernedbyestablishedprinciplesaswellasbystatute ๏ do I need to know case names? ‣ ideally, yes! English business law ( and to a lesser extent company law, partnership law and employment law ) is case driven – that is, the principle is established by the decided cases, not the other way round. ‣ so, in an ideal World, you would be able to state the principle and then ( in brackets, and underlined ) you would name the case ‣ for many ACCA students English is not their rst language ( indeed, in many cases, it‘s not even their second language! ) so cases like “Partridge v Crittenden” are two very strange family names. ‣ for natural English speakers, particularly those from the UK and Ireland, it wouldn‘t be unusual for them to know actual people with those family names. Fisher v Bell is a good example – both are names of current / former English cricketers! ‣ so, for those of you who are non-UK / Ireland based, here are one or two comforting thoughts • if you remember both parties in a case, name them eg “Goods in a shop window are invitations to treat and are not offers capable of acceptance ( Fisher v Bell )” • if you can remember only one name, say “Goods in a shop window are invitations to treat and are not offers capable of acceptance ( Fisher‘s case )” • if you can remember neither name, but can rememb