毕业论文--人类白细胞抗原HLA-B27与强直性脊柱炎的相关性及两种检测方法的比较.docVIP

毕业论文--人类白细胞抗原HLA-B27与强直性脊柱炎的相关性及两种检测方法的比较.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
人类白细胞抗原HLA-B27与强直性脊柱炎的相关性及两种检测方法的比较 PAGE 6 PAGE 7 人类白细胞抗原HLA-B27与强直性脊柱炎的相关性及两种检测方法的比较 摘要:目的 探讨人类白细胞抗原B27(HLA-B27)的阳性率与强直性脊柱炎(AS)的相关性,并对两种检测方法进行比较。方法 首先用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)分别对78名AS患者、172名疑似AS患者及158名非AS患者分别进行检测,计算HLA-B27的阳性率;然后对172名疑似AS患者再用微量淋巴细胞毒试验(MLCT)法进行HLA-B27检测,比较两种方法的检测结果,从而找出更合理的方法。结果 经检测,78名AS患者、172名疑似AS患者及158名非AS患者的HLA-B27的阳性率分别为96.15%、34.88%、5.70%,三组结果有显著性差异(卡方检验,P0.05);172名疑似AS患者中,ELISA与MLCT均阳性者56人,均阴性者91人,前阳后阴者15人,前阴后阳者10人,两种方法检测结果无统计学意义(卡方检验,x2=0.64,P0.05)。结论 HLA-B27阳性与AS密切相关,是诊断AS的重要依据;ELISA法较MLCT法对HLA-B27的阳性检出率稍高,但无明显差异,而MLCT法无需特殊仪器,且费用较低,故适用于基层医疗结构。 关键词:HLA-B27;强直性脊柱炎;酶联免疫吸附法;微量淋巴细胞毒试验(MLCT) Correlation between HLA-B27 and Ankylosing Spondylitis and comparation of two detective methods Abstract: Objective To investigate the relationship between HLA-B27 and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and compare the two kinds of detective methods. Methods ELISA was used to detect HLA-B27 antigen in 78 cases of AS patients, 172 cases of suspected AS patients and 158 non AS patients, calculate the positive rate of HLA-B27; then Microlymphocytotoxicity Test (MLCT) was also used to detect the 172 cases of suspected AS patients and compare the detective results and find a more reasonnable method. Result The positive rate of HLA-B27 in 78 patients diagnosed with AS is 96.15%, in 172 patients with suspected AS is 34.88% and in 158 non AS patients is 5.70%, which has significant difference (P0.05); In 172 cases of suspected AS patients, 56 is both positive detected by ELISA and MLCT, 91 is both negative, 15 is positive detected by ELISA and negative by MLCT, 10 is negative by ELISA and positive by MLCT, there are no statistically significances between ELISA and MLCT (Chi-square test, x2=0.64, P0.05). Conclusion HLA-B27 positive rate is closely related with AS, and is important evidence to diagnose AS. ELISA is more sensitive than MLCT in HLA-B27 positive detecting, but without significant difference (P0.05); As MLCT does not need special instrument and the cost is relatively l

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

ze122230743 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档