ACRD101制冷系统解决方案呈现.ppt

This slide shows the list of condensers offered with the InRow RD In NAM, The ACCD 75214 are manufactured by Larkin while the Rest of the World are manufactured by Thermokey in Italy. There is a low and high ambient offering for all regions with 230V offered in NAM. 230V and 400V options are available for EMEA, LAM, GCN and APJ This table breaks down and quantifies the energy consumption between the two containment cases outlined in the preceding table that allowed for an acceptable work environment temperature while providing acceptable IT inlet air temperatures—CACS (3rd row) and HACS (5th row). The energy costs are broken down by IT, power, cooling, and total data center energy consumption. The IT energy includes all IT equipment, which is held constant in this analysis at 700kW The “power energy” includes losses from switchgear, generator, UPS, primary and critical auxiliary devices, UPS, lighting, and critical power distribution The “cooling energy” includes losses from chiller, cooling tower, chilled water pumps, condenser water pumps, and perimeter CRAH units Total energy is the sum of IT, power, and cooling energy and is directly related to PUE In a typical data center, 50% loaded, the IT energy is the largest portion of the energy cost, followed by the cooling system energy cost. In comparison to CACS, at the same 75°F/24°C work environment, the HACS consumes 40% less cooling system energy. The majority of these savings are attributed to the economizer hours when the chiller is off. At this work environment temperature, the CACS is unable to benefit from any economizer hours due to the low chilled water supply temperature. The small difference in the power system energy is due to an increase in losses across the switchgear which is caused by the extra hours of chiller operation in the CACS case. ? In comparison to the traditional uncontained baseline case, the CACS consumes 9% less cooling system energy and 3% less total data center energy. In co