英文文章回复审稿意见信.pdfVIP

AMR‐09‐0402.R2 Comments to editors and reviewers    I have now received and considered the reviews of your revised manuscript submitted to Academy of Management Review “HUMAN RESOURCE SYSTEMS AND HELPING IN ORGANIZATIONS: A RELATIONAL  PERSPECTIVE” (Manuscript AMR‐09‐0402.R1). All three of your reviewers agree that your manuscript  has made good progress and you’ve made a good effort to respond to their earlier concerns. We all  appreciate the clearer focus on the linkages between HR systems and helping and recognize the time  and energies you put into this revision.    Your reviewers also agree that at this stage, several issues remain. I share the opinion that your revised  manuscript is much improved and that you undertook great effort to be responsive to the earlier  feedback. And, while I agree there are still some issues to address, I believe these issues can be  addressed with relatively moderate additional effort and thus, I am pleased to conditionally accept your manuscript for publication in AMR subject to the changes below. Congratulations! I will not  be returning your revised manuscript to the reviewers, but instead will be ensuring the remaining  changes are made on their behalf.    In terms of the remaining changes I’d like you to make, it is important that you consider all the  comments made by the reviewers but I would like to highlight the primary factors that I believe are  necessary to move forward. I would like you to focus your energies on the points I note below.    Dear Professor Lepak: Thank you for the positive feedback and conditionally accepting our paper. In this round of revision, we focused our efforts strongly on the points made in your letter. Below, we grouped actions taken in response to your comments, organized under the major headings supplied. As before, we attempted to be succinct while fully explaining our actions. Although we replied direct