- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
肿瘤血液标志物的研发及临床评价?;Ten Leading Cancer Types for the Estimated New Cancer Cases and Deaths by Sex, United States, 2013;Nature Reviews Cancer, 2011, 426-437;Outline of strategies for biomarker discovery through utilization of emerging technologies.;Cancer biomarkers that are currently in clinical use;;Multi-parameter panels can significantly improve the diagnostic value
compared to the conventional biomarker ;8; A. 6例早期原发性肝癌和6例健康对照的全基因组甲基化水平。
B. 早期原发性肝癌组和健康对照组全基因组甲基化水平比较;?
与健康对照组相比,早期原发性肝癌组差异甲基化位点的个数及倍数关系;与健康对照组相比,早期原发性肝癌组差异甲基化位点的基因分布;β值大于0.5为超甲基化
β值小于0.2为超低甲基化
我们筛选出453个健康对照组和37个原发性肝细胞癌组的超甲基化位点。;超甲基化位点的基因本体论和基因功能富集分析; 原发性肝细胞癌组中超甲基化位点的GO及功能富集分析; 健康对照组中超甲基化位点的GO及功能富集分析; 基因功能富集分析后健康对照组中超甲基化位点的基因相互作用分析;DBX2和THY1甲基化位点通过亚硫酸盐测序法验证;DBX2和THY1甲基化位点通过亚硫酸盐测序法进行扩大样本验证 A. DBX2和THY1甲基化位点在原发性肝癌组和健康对照组的甲基化水平比较。B. DBX2和THY1甲基化位点用于区分原发性肝癌组和健康对照组的诊断价值;Multi-parameter model for diagnosis of cancer;29例慢性胰腺炎
82例急性胰腺炎
162例胰腺癌
33例结肠炎
62例结肠息肉
101例结肠癌
20例结肠癌术后
40例胃增生
139例胃癌
31例慢性肺炎
28例小细胞肺癌
32例肺鳞癌
72例肺腺癌
22例乳腺增生
101例乳腺癌
65例宫颈良性病变
72例宫颈癌
18例宫颈癌术后
84例前列腺增生
108例前列腺癌
12例前列腺癌术后
200例健康对照;For differentiating between the colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer groups. The AUC of multivariate logistic regression was 0.945 (95% CI: 0.909–0.981). Compared with the conventional biomarkers CEA and CA199, the AUC of multivariate logistic regression showed significant improvements (p 0.05). AUC: Area under the curve. ;26;Figure 1. Flowchart of our experimental design;Table 1. Clinical characteristic of the studied subjects;Table 2. List of the serum parameters in the 61-plex panel;Table 3. The sensitivity of top 20 performing 4 serum parameter panels for discriminating PDAC Vs Control and PDAC Vs Benign group identified by MMC algorithm applied to the training set at 90% specificity;Figure 2. ROC curves analysis for discriminating between the PDAC versus Control and PDAC versus Benign groups in the training group. ROC curves of CA19-9, ALB, CRP and IL-8 panel (solid line) and CA19
原创力文档


文档评论(0)