- 9
- 0
- 约4.55万字
- 约 51页
- 2019-11-09 发布于湖北
- 举报
* * * * * * * 强调超140名员工,技术支持中心。强大的售后支持,是软件稳定运行的保证。 * * * * * * Volume Manager Logical VM mirroring limitations are due to SAN radius constraints. Not the VM software itself. Also, as distances increase, the effect of latency may also increase. As VM-like solutions are synchronous in nature, the application cannot proceed faster than the latency of the network. This is also true for any replication/mirroring solutions that runs only in synchronous mode (incl. VVR, SRDF, …). So, use Volume Manager when mirroring within a SAN and mirroring synchronously Volume Replicator can be much less sensitive to latency and can more gracefully handle network interruptions which are common in WAN environments. To achieve great distances in data replication, some technologies provide an asynchronous mode which allows the latency effect to be removed. One must ensure that data consistency is maintained, however. Notice that the area of overlap is just an example of where this may occur for a particular environment. For example, we’ve certainly seen data replication used in distances less than 1km. Use VVR anytime you want to replicate asynchronously or over IP. * In addition to Storage Checkpoints, Foundation Suite also provides availability through remote mirroring. The same technology that lets volume manager mirror disks within an array or a data center can be used to mirror disks across a fibre channel network that spans a city or a campus. Volume Manager doesn’t care whether those mirrored volumes are sitting next to each other in the data center or across town. In fact, a recent independent benchmark demonstrated that for remote mirroring, Foundation Suite performs much better than other replication solutions like EMC SRDF. And since it works across arrays from different vendors you can effectively utilize the storage you have today without purchasing additional expensive arrays. * * * Finally, Storage Foundation keeps disk-based backups of critical data for
原创力文档

文档评论(0)