作文范文之gmat作文重要吗.docxVIP

gmat 作文重要吗 【篇一： gmat 写作七宗罪详细分析】 gmat 写作七宗罪详细分析 gmat 写作七宗罪在 gmat 写作中的地位不容小觑，考生想要获得 gmat 写作高分就必须对 gmat 写作七宗罪有全面准确的理解，这样 才能保证 gmat 作文的质量。接下来小编就 gmat 写作七宗罪为大家 做详细介绍，希望对大家的 gmat 写作备考有帮助。 一、什么是 “七宗罪 ” gmat 作文七宗罪是指 gmat 驳论文 argument 题目中存在的逻辑漏 洞或错误，考生根据考试中常见的逻辑漏洞和考察方向把其总结为 “七宗罪 ”，既形象又方便参加 gmat 考试备考的考生进行背诵。考生 在备考时可以按照七宗罪中的逻辑错误类型进行有目的的查找，一 方面节省了考试时间，另一方面确保找到的逻辑错误的准确，对于 提升 gmat 写作效率也非常有帮助。 通常考生所说的七宗罪指的就是：第一宗罪：无因果联系，第二宗 罪：样本不足，第三宗罪：错误类比 （横向 ）第四宗罪：时地全等 （没 有用发展的观点看待问题 ），第五宗罪：二者择一 （非此即彼 ），第六 宗罪：可疑调查，第七宗罪：结论无据 （无根据假设 ）。可能个别地方 的叫法不完全一样，考生只要知道其表达的真正意义即可。更多相 关内容请点击 gmat 写作考试七宗罪分析。 二、七宗罪包含哪些内容 第一宗罪：无因果联系，是指作者给出的解释和得出的结论没有因 果上的联系，或者是二者毫不相关。 the author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. the line of the reasoning is that because a occurred before b, the former event is responsible for the latter. but this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. for example, perhaps c is the cause of these events or perhaps b is caused by d. 第二宗罪 样本不足，是指给出的论据或例子不充分，不足以说明某 个问题，不能支撑作者得出这样的结论。 the evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. one example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion, unless it can be shown that a1 is representative of all a. it is possible that in fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that b is completely unwarranted. 第三宗罪 : 错误类比，即把毫不相关的两个事物拿来作比较，并由此 得出一些结论。 the argument rests on the assumption that a is analogous to b in all respects. this assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between a and b, there is much dissimilarity as well. for example, a..., however, b thus, it is likely much more difficult for b to do 第四宗罪 时地全等，主要是指没有用发展的观点看待问题，拿过去 的事例和现在的作对比，并由此得出结论。 the author commits the fallacy of “ all things are equal ” . the fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that the author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at di