试论罗章龙的社会经济史研究.pdfVIP

华东师范大学硕士学位论文 摘 要 罗章龙是中共早期活动家，1934 年起因故离开政坛，进入高校，长期从事 中国经济史的教学和研究，取得了一定成就。本文以讨论罗氏经济史研究的思想、 理论方法和成就得失为主。凡三章，首章梳理罗章龙的思想源流及变化，认为他 早年宗奉马克思主义的唯物史观，脱离政坛后学术上虽仍在一定程度上受唯物史 观的影响，但已不再坚持先前的社会革命目标，其对中国社会经济史特别是社会 形态演变的看法，总体上也与国内马克思主义史家存在明显差异。后两章分别讨 论其所著的 《经济史学原论》和 《中国国民经济史》，对其提出的经济史研究理 论，包括全元论、史期论、史型论进行述评。并结合他对中国经济史的研究实践， 分析其理论架构、治史特点和成果得失探索。认为其所著《中国国民经济史》对 中国社会经济通史的研究有一定的开创意义，长处在于比较注重从中国历史和经 济发展的自身特点出发，并具有很强的理论思辨特点，但受到时代及个人思想的 局限，无论在史料的搜集运用还是观点的论证方面，都存在需进一步推敲的地方。 关键词：罗章龙 经济史论 中国经济史 马克思主义史学 V 华东师范大学硕士学位论文 Abstract Luo Zhanglong was an early activist of the Chinese Communist Party. After leaving politics in 1934, he entered university and has been engaged in the teaching and research of Chinese economic history for a long time. This article consists of three chapters. The first chapter sorts out the source and changes of Luo Zhanglongs thought. In his early years, he insisted on the historical materialism of Marxism. Although he was still influenced by the historical materialism to a certain extent academically after leaving politics, he no longer adhered to the goals of the previous social revolution. His views on Chinese social and economic history, especially the evolution of social formations, are generally different from Chinese Marxist historians. The latter two chapters discuss Essentials of Economic History and History of Chinese National Economy respectively, and comment on the economic history theories, including totalism, period theory, and historical theory. In combination with his research and practice of Chinese economic history, this article analyzes