Poling_B.E.,_Prausnitz_J.M.,_OConnell_J.P_0181-0240英文精品课件.pdfVIP

PRESSURE-VOLUME-TEMPERATURE RELATIONSHIPS OF MIXTURES 5.19 from a rigorous or approximate theory, from a Taylor’s expansion, or from intuition. The result is that there are very many models obtained in this manner and expressed in this form; the general ideas for pure components have often been applied to mixtures. A useful discussion of this approach is given by Abbott and Prausnitz (1987). Our purpose here is to mention the possible options and give a few references to specific models which have become popular, especially for phase equilibria (see Sec. 8-12). Much more complete reviews are given by Anderko (1990), Sandler, et al. (1994) and Prausnitz, et al. (1999). A very important point is that models of the form of Eq. (4-7.4) inevitably have a positive reference term and negative pertur- bation terms. This is necessary to be able to describe both vapors and liquids, but the consequence is that the perturbation terms at high density are typically about the same magnitude as the reference term. This can cause difficulties in evaluation and errors in estimation. Further, the isotherms in the two-phase region can be quite complex, especially at low temperatures (see, for example, Koak, et al. 1999). Reference Fluid Expressions. The most common mixture reference is that of Mansoori, et al. (MCSL) (1971) which is typically written in terms of the com- pressibility factor 6 3 33 Z MCSL 0 1 2 2 (5-6.2a) R (1 ) (1 )2 (1 )3 3 3 3 where the covolumes are n N j j yi A i j 0, 1, 2, 3