- 7
- 0
- 约1.35千字
- 约 15页
- 2020-12-16 发布于四川
- 举报
*;*;*; is not a new refrigerant - it was studied during the 1990s in the search for a solution but was not adopted due to concerns about its flammability characteristics. But now, the requirement for likely requires accepting some flammability constraints for the refrigerants. HFC-32 and HFOs are both expected to be mildly flammable with an ASHRAE flammability safety rating and involve significant tradeoffs among efficiency, GWP, and cost.;Relative theoretical capacity R32 vs. R410;Relative theoretical EER R32 vs. R410;2. PROPERTIES COMPARISON - R32 vs. R410A;the actual relative compressor EER is on average about 2-3% lower than theoretical;Discharge temperature correlation;*;CONCLUSIONS;The HFO blends need to offer more compelling advantages over R32 due to their currently higher cost. They have same A2L flammability as R32. To sustain efficiency, their GWP is constrained to around 500, not much lowerthan R32 when charge is factored in. On an LCCP basis, the HFO blends are comparable to R32, but their use may be limited initially until their cost position becomes clearer. ;Natural refrigerants (CO2 and R290) with ultra-low GWP so far have not shown to be cost-effective solutions for mainstream air conditioning due to their low efficiency and/or A3 flammability safety reasons. ;*
原创力文档

文档评论(0)