- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
早期胃癌诊断治疗中消化内镜黏膜下剥离术的价值分析
郑仁斌 乐桥良 郭超 陆晶 刘元辉
[摘要] 目的 探討早期胃癌诊断治疗中消化内镜黏膜下剥离术的价值,以提高早期胃癌患者的生存质量。
方法 选取20XX年2月~20XX年3月于我院就诊的早期胃癌患者60例为研究对象,依据治疗方式不同分为两组,对照组30例予常规诊断治疗,观察组30例予消化内镜黏膜下剥离术,比较两组的临床治疗指标、病理结果、并发症发生率。
结果 两组患者临床治疗指标比较,观察组各项指标明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者的病理结果比较,观察组可见1例侧切缘有癌组织残留,经内镜下再次行黏膜下剥离术完整切除病灶;1例水平切缘有癌组织残留,追加腹腔镜手术切除病灶,术后病理未见癌细胞。两组患者有无癌残留及完整切除情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者并发症发生率比较,观察组显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。
结论 临床对早期胃癌患者进行诊断治疗时,予以消化内镜黏膜下剥离术能够取得良好的诊断以及治疗效果,同时并发症发生较少,安全有效,值得推广。
[关键词] 早期胃癌;诊断治疗;消化内镜;黏膜下剥离术;并发症;疗效
[中图分类号] R735.2 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-9701(2020)21-0011-04
Analysis of value of endoscopic submucosal dissection in diagnosis and treatment of early gastric cancer
ZHENG Renbin LE Qiaoliang GUO Chao LU Jing LIU Yuanhui
Department of Gastroenterology, Mindong Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuan 355000, China
[Abstract] Objective To probe into the value of endoscopic submucosal dissection in diagnosis and treatment of early gastric cancer, in order to improve the quality of life of patients with early gastric cancer. Methods 60 cases of patients with early gastric cancer and who treated in our hospital from February 20XX to March 20XX were selected for research and observation, and the patients were divided into two groups according to the different treatment methods.The control group of 30 cases received routine diagnosis and treatment, while the observation group of 30 cases received endoscopic submucosal dissection. The clinical treatment indexes, pathological results and complication rate of two groups were compared. Results The clinical treatment indexes between the two groups were compared, the each indexes in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was significant(P0.05). The pathological results of two groups were compared, in the observation group, 1 case had residual cancer on the lateral margin, and was completely re
文档评论(0)