- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
无痛电子胃镜和普通胃镜在小儿上消化道异物取出术的应用对比
陈亮任
[摘要]目的 探討无痛电子胃镜和普通胃镜在小儿上消化道异物取出术中的应用。方法 选取我院20XX年1月~20XX年4月收治的42例上消化道异物患儿作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组(21例)和观察组(21例)。对照组采用普通胃镜治疗,观察组采用无痛电子胃镜治疗。比较两组患儿异物取出成功率、围术期不同时间节点血流动力学变化及不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组患儿异物取出成功率(95.24%)高于对照组(71.43%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05);对照组患儿术中平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)高于本组术前,观察组患儿术中MAP及HR低于本组术前,且低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患儿术前、术中、术后血氧饱和度(SpO2)比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);观察组患儿不良反应总发生率(9.52%)低于对照组(47.62%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 在小儿上消化道异物取出术采用无痛电子胃镜手术异物取出成功率高,对血流动力学影响较小,且不良反应发生率低。
[关键词]无痛电子胃镜;普通胃镜;上消化道异物;异物取出术
[中图分类号] R726.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2020)7(c)-0050-04
Application comparison of painless electronic gastroscope and ordinary gastroscope in the removal of foreign bodies in children′s upper digestive tract
CHEN Liang-ren
Department of Gastroenterology, People′s Hospital of Gaozhou, Guangdong Province, Gaozhou 525200, China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the application of painless electronic gastroscope and ordinary gastroscope in the removal of foreign bodies in children′s upper digestive tract. Methods A total of 42 children with foreign bodies in the upper digestive tract admitted to our hospital from January 20XX to April 20XX were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into control group (21 cases) and observation group (21 cases). The control group was treated with ordinary gastroscope, and the observation group was treated with painless electronic gastroscope. The success rate of foreign body removal, the hemodynamic changes at different time points during the perioperative period and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The success rate of foreign body removal in the observation group (95.24%) was higher than that in the control group (71.43%), the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of the children in the control group were higher than those
文档评论(0)