- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
How to Get the Poor off Our Conscience;John Kenneth Galbraith(1908-2006);John Kenneth Galbraith;Discussion and Pre-class Works:;Detailed study:
I(1-2):
*Get the poor off our conscience: conscience, a sense of right
and wrong, with an urge to do right
*intellectual: appealing to the intellect
II (3-9):
*The poor suffer in the world but…: in the next, after they die; when
they go to the next world, i.e. heaven or paradise
*This is, in some ways, an admirable solution…. : why? And does the
author really think that this is an admirable solution? (Discuss about it)
* “the principle of utility”: an artion is judged by whether it will increase or decrease the benefits of those who are affected by the action.
*Poverty being caused in the bed…: Poverty was caused by
overproduction of children.
*overriding: Prevailing
;*The American Beauty Rose can be …:
美国这朵玫瑰花后以其华贵让观众倾倒、赞不绝口。而她之所以
能被培植出来,就是因为在早期其周围的花蕾给掐掉了。在经济
生活中情况亦是如此。这是自然规律和上帝意志在起作用。
III(10-11)
What was the Roosevelt revolution? Why does the author call it a revolution? Is he for or against the revolution? How do you know?
How did people feel when a number of social measures were put into practice? Were they right in thinking so?
IV(12-20)
What is the argument of the first design? Essence?
*We have great corporate bureaucracies replete with corporate bureaucrats, … ,(When these …, all been in the Pantagon.):
What is the basic view of the author?
What is the tone of this statement?
;What is the second design?
Does the author agree to the argument?
What is the argument of the third design?
How dose the author refute this argument?
*corporate executive: 企业经理人员
*Belief can be the servant of truth-but even more of convenience:
Belief can be used in the search for truth. But more often than not
it is accepted because it is convenience and self-serving.
What is the fourth design?
*Finally, when all else fails, we resort to simpl
文档评论(0)