- 4
- 0
- 约1.4万字
- 约 9页
- 2021-02-11 发布于天津
- 举报
碳税政策下低碳技术研发形式比较
12
魏守道 ,杨仕辉
(1. 广东金融学院,广东
广州 510521; 2. 暨南大学经济学院,广东 广州 510632)
摘 要: 在国家实施碳税政策的背景下,构建了开放经济下国家设定碳税税率、企业选择低碳技术 研发竞争或研发合作及研发水平、产量水平的三阶段博弈模型,利用均衡解,从企业最优低碳技术 研发水平、净碳排放量、企业利润和国家福利四个方面,比较了研发竞争和研发合作的效果。发现 较之于研发竞争,企业进行研发合作必定会提高低碳技术研发水平、降低净碳排放量和改善国家福 利,有可能会提高企业利润。进一步研究发现,碳排放对环境的损害越严重、研发成果溢出率或研 发效率越高,企业进行研发合作必定对提高低碳技术研发水平、降低净碳排放量和改善国家福利越 有利,也有可能对提高企业利润越有利。
关键词: 碳税 ;研发竞争;研发合作;博弈模型 中图分类号: F741, F270 文献标识码: A
Comparison between Organizations of Environmental RD under Carbon Tax Policy
12
Wei Shou-dao , Yang Shi-hui
(1. Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou China, 510521;
2. College of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou China, 510632)
Abstract: Under the background that countries in an open economy carry out carbon tax, two three-staged game models are constructed where countries set optimal level of carbon tax, firms choose environmental RD competition and RD cooperation and set optimal levels of RD and output. With equilibriums of these two models, optimal levels of environmental RD, net carbon emission, profit and welfare are compared between RD competition and RD cooperation. It s found that if firms choose RD cooperation, optimal levels of environmental RD, net carbon emission and welfare are always much higher, maybe profit is also much higher. Furthermore, it s still found that when the environmental damage caused by carbon emission is more serious, environmental RD spillover is larger, and RD efficiency is higher, RD cooperation is always a preferable organization to increase RD level, reduce carbon emission and improve welfare, and maybe a preferable organization to increase profit.
Key words: carbon tax; RD competition; RD cooperation; game model
征文类别 :经济数学与低碳经济
作者简介 :魏守道 (1983.12-) ,男 (汉族),湖北武汉人,广东金融学院工商管理系讲师,博士,研究 方向:战略环境 - 贸易政策;
杨仕辉 (1965.7-) ,男 (汉族),江西丰城人,暨南大学经济学院教授,博士,博士生导师, 研究方向:战略环境 - 贸易政策。
联系地址: 广州市天河区迎福路 527 号 邮政编码: 510521
联系电话:E-mail: 163.com
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金资助项目 。
碳税政策下低碳技术研发形式比较
1 引言
随着世界经济的快速发展,各国对化石燃料
原创力文档

文档评论(0)