prep12逻辑分类分析.pdfVIP

首先奉上两段前人的话： Lawyer ：第一步看问题。第二步看原文，分清结论和支持结论的理由，特别是原文有些信息只是背 景知 识，不是理由，结论有时也不一定有 THEREFORE 之类的词，甚至有了这些词，结论也可能和它不一 样，搞清结论要结合原文作者要表达的方向和理由支持的方向。第三步从选项中分清有关无 关，留下 有关的，去掉无关的。和结论讨论的话题或TOPIC 无关的就是无关。第四步，按不同题型再最后分清 正确与错误选项。用这 4 个步骤去琢磨 OG ，相信段时间会有提高(lawyer) 无论如何强调对结论的重视都是不过分的，因为选项最终是作用在结论上。如果一个选项满足了两个条 件：方向上了和结论一致 （排除相反选项：即问题问支持，给削弱的答案。反之亦然 ），并且符合结论 的特殊性和具体性。这个选项就是正确答案。所以做题时，看原文时要找产生结论的前提和结论 ，在 脑中形成推理结构 （因为。。。所以。。。），特别是结论，以结论作为有关无关的标准去排除无关相， 剩下的再排除相反选项，就找到了答案。 一、削弱 XPrep2012-Pack1-CR-001 VCR07575 Easy According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls 批注 [h1]: 达到目的的措施 on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authoritys plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit. Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the effectiveness of the authoritys 批注 [h2]: 直接影响 plan 的效果 plan to finance the proposed improvements by increasing bridge tolls? 批注 [h3]: 目的 批注 [h4]: 在收费之前，需要开法律 A. Before the authority increases tolls on any of the area bridges, it is required by law to hold public 公众听证会。可是没说公众的反应， hearings at which objections to the proposed increase can be raised. 他们如果支持，则依然会收费，那么 B. Whenever bridge tolls are increased, the authority must pay a private contractor to adjust the finance 的目的就会达成 automated toll-collecting machines.