国际私法习题3.docx

Case an alysis （第一题）Richard Roe, whose citizenship is in country B resided in country A, litigated in country A on capacity issue one day. Country A ack no wledges renvoi system, whosec on flict rules stipulates that capacity is governed by law of the nationality of an interested party, but the conflict rules of country B stipulates, capacity is governed by the law of the domicile. Question: What national law should be governed on capacity of Richard Roe in this case? 理查德罗伊，其公民在B国居住在国家的一个诉讼，在国家关于能力的问题， 有一天。A国承认反致制度，其冲突规则规定能力利害关系人的国籍的法律管 辖，但B国的冲突规则规定，能力是由住所地的法律管辖。 问：在这种情况下，国家法律应管辖理查德罗伊的能力？ （第二题）Li Bokang s Succession Case , the Court in Guangzhou, 1986 Li Boka ng and Fan Suxia n, both Chin ese, got married in the city of Taishan in Guangdong in 1938 but had no children. Li moved to California in 1943 and married Zhou Ledi in 1967 in Nevada, USA and died in 1981. In 1986, Fan Suxia n, who had stayed in Hongkon gfor many years, applied to a public no tary office in Guan gzhou for the in herita nee of the four-story house in Guangzhouleft by Li Bokang and acquired the ownership of the house two mon th later. Mea nwhile, Zhou Ledi, Li s sec ond wife, hired an attorney to file an action in the court in Guangzhoufor the right to in herit the house. 李博康和风扇苏仙，无论是中国人，于 1938年，在广东省台山市结婚但没有孩 子。李在1943年搬到加州，并在1967年结婚，在美国内华达州，周 LEDI并 于1981年去世。 1986年，范苏仙，曾在香港呆了多年，应用公共广州市公证处，为四层的房子 在广州的继承离开李博康，并取得了一个月后，房子的所有权。同时，李的第二 任妻子，周LEDI，雇了一名律师，在广州法院的诉讼文件的继承权的房子。 The court held that Fan Suxia n （a Hongkong reside nt） was the legitimate wife of Li Boka ng and the marriage betwee n Li and Zhou was illegal because Li and Fan were not divorced and the remarriage between Li and Zhou Ledi in US was a bigamy. Under Article 2 of the Marriage Lawof the People s Republic of China, the cour t dismissed Zhou Ledi s complaint to inherit the house. 法院认为风扇苏仙（香港居民），李博康的合法妻子，李与周之间的婚姻是非法 的，因为李和范不离婚，李周在美国 LEDI的再婚是重婚。 根据中国人民共和国婚姻法“第 2条，法院驳回周LEDI继承房子的投诉。 Questi ons: What are the major problems in this case? Are