讲义课件参考文稿sec03_contact1.pptx

Section 3;Review on Constraint Methods Segment-to-Segment Contact Contact Table Spline Glue Separation Friction Release Initial Contact ;Among the several approaches within the finite element framework that have been used to model the frictional contact and impose the non-penetration constraint, the most popular ones are: Penalty Methods [Peric and Owen, 1992], Lagrange Multiplier [Chaudhary and Bathe, 1986], Augmented Lagrangian [Laursen and Simo, 1993], Perturbed Lagrangian [Simo, Wriggers, and Taylor, 1985], Hybrid Methods [Wunderlich, 1981], Gap Elements, Interface Elements, Direct application of contact forces Solver Constraints;Lagrange multipliers Increased number of equations Zero terms on main diagonal of system matrix Used by Marc for gap elements Augmented Lagrangian Increased number of equations Used by Marc for Segment-to-Segment Contact Penalty functions Number of equations remains the same Increase density of system matrix Choice of penalty function is problem dependent Used by Marc for boundary conditions Used by Marc for Segment-to-Segment if no Augmentation;Solver constraints No additional degrees of freedom Increased bandwidth of system matrix No special elements required Used by Marc for Node-to-Segment Contact;2-D 3-D for linear and quadratic solid elements 2-D 3-D for linear and quadratic shell elements Improved Accuracy No Master-Slave Concept Supports finite sliding contact with Bilinear Coulomb and Bilinear Shear friction Non-symmetric matrix is given to increase the speed of convergence, but requires more memory Analysis with different augmentation values Supports rigid-deformable contact Supports multi-physics Supports beam-beam contact ;Equation reflecting the normal contact conditions to be taken into account is: where G is the contact body boundary being in contact gn is the gap function gt is the tangential gap vector ln is the Lagrange multiplier (contact pressure) lt is the tangent stress vector ;Gn 0 - point i