2021年最新TED英语演讲：可爱,性感,甜,搞笑.docxVIP

资料来源：来自本人网络整理！祝您工作顺利！ PAGE 1 PAGE 1 2021年最新TED英语演讲：可爱,性感,甜,搞笑 　　为什么宝宝得意? 为什么蛋糕甜蜜? 哲学家Dan Dennett有你不会期望的答案，因为他共享了得意，甜蜜和性感的东西进化的违背直觉的推理。下面是我为大家搜集关于TED英语演讲：得意,性感,甜,搞笑，欢送借鉴参考。   　　Cute, sexy, sweet, funny  　　演讲者：Dan Dennett  　　| 中英对比演讲稿 |  　　Im going around the world giving talks about Darwin, and usually what Im talking about is Darwins strange inversion of reasoning. Now that title, that phrase, comes from a critic, an early critic, and this is a passage that I just love, and would like to read for you.  　　我常常在世界各地做关于达尔文的演讲，一般我都要讲到的是达尔文惊奇的反向规律。这个头衔，这个名词，来自于一个批判，一个早先的批判。我喜爱这篇文章，很愿意给大家念一下。  　　In the theory with which we have to deal, Absolute Ignorance is the artificer; so that we may enunciate as the fundamental principle of the whole system, that, in order to make a perfect and beautiful machine, it is not requisite to know how to make it. This proposition will be found on careful examination to express, in condensed form, the essential purport of the Theory, and to express in a few words all Mr. Darwins meaning; who, by a strange inversion of reasoning, seems to think.Absolute Ignorance fully qualified to take the place of Absolute Wisdom in the achievements of creative skill.  　　这个我们要讨论的理论之中，全然无知变成了制造者;那么让我们清晰说明这个理论体系的根本原那么，那就是，在制造一个完善的机器之前，完全没有必要知道如何来制造它。这种说法被建立在详尽的讨论之上来传达这个理论的要义，也传达了达尔文先生的全部意思;他用这样一种惊奇的反向规律好像认为肯定的无知完全有资格取代肯定的才智来完成需要制造性技能的工作。  　　Exactly. Exactly. And it is a strange inversion. A creationist pamphlet has this wonderful page in it: TestTwo: Do you know of any building that didnt have a builder? Yes/No. Do you know of any painting that didnt have a painter? Yes/No. Do you know of any car that didnt have a maker? Yes/No. If you answered Yes for any of the above,give details.  　　可不是嘛!可不是嘛!这真是一个惊奇的反向。一位上帝论者的小册子上有这样一页特别精彩：测验二 你知道任何一栋建筑没有它的建立者?有，没有 你知道有任何一副画没有它的绘画者?有，没有 你知道有任何一辆小汽车没有它的制造者么?有，没有 假如你在任一问题中答有，给出其详情。  　　A-ha! I mean, it really is a strange inversion of reasoning. You would have thought it