《统计学基础（英文版·第7版）》教学课件les7e_ppt_10_01.pptxVIP

Chapter;Chapter Outline;Section 10.1;Section 10.1 Objectives;Multinomial Experiments;Multinomial Experiments;Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Multinomial Experiments;Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Example: Finding Observed and Expected Frequencies;Solution: Finding Observed and Expected Frequencies;Solution: Finding Observed and Expected Frequencies;Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Performing a Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Performing a Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Performing a Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Example: Performing a Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Example: Performing a Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test;Solution: The observed and expected frequencies are shown in the table. Because the observed frequencies were obtained using a random sample and each expected frequency is at least 5, you can use the chi-square goodness-of-fit test to test the proposed distribution.;Here are the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: The expected distribution of tax preparation methods is 24% by accountant, 20% by hand, 35% by computer software, 6% by friend or family, and 15% by tax preparation service. (Claim) Ha: The distribution of tax preparation methods differs from the expected distribution.;Because there are 5 categories, the chi-square distribution has d.f. = k – 1 = 5 – 1 = 4 degrees of freedom. With d.f. = 4 and a = 0.01, the critical value is ?o2 = 13.277. The rejection region is ?2 13.277. Rejection region;?;The figure shows the location ofthe rejection region and the chi-square test statistic. Because ?2 is in the rejection region, you reject the null hypothesis. There is enough evidence at the 1% level of significance to reject the claim that the distribution of tax preparation methods and the association’s expected distribution are the same.;Example: Performing a Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Test;Solution: Performing a Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Tes