采用不同工质的压缩气体储能系统热力性能对比分析.pdfVIP

第43卷第2期 动 力 程 学 报 Vol.43.No.2 2023年2月 Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering Feb.2023 文章编号：167402-0269-06 D0I:10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2023.02.019 采用不同工质的压缩气体储能系统热力性能对比分 李阳海，梅欣，徐万兵，王渊静² ，杨　涛² ，弓 张燕平2 （1.国网湖北省电力有限公司电力科学研究院，武汉430077； 2.华中科技大学能源与动力工程学院，武汉430074） 摘要：通过完善高、中、低温压缩气体储能系统结构，分别使用空气和CO22种工质进行仿真模 拟，对使用不同工质的系统循环效率、储能密度和进行分析和对比。结果表明：使用空气工质的 高、中温系统循环效率更高，低温系统反之；使用空气工质的系统效率更高；使用CO2工质的系 统储能密度更高，系统输入、输出和斓损失更低。 关键词：压缩气体储能；空气；CO2；循环效率；储能密度；分析 中图分类号：TK14 文献标志码：A 学科分类号：480.40 Comparative Analysis of Thermal Performance of Compressed Gas Energy Storage Systems Using Different Working Fluids LIYanghai (1. State Grid Hubei Electric Power Testing Research Institute, Wuhan 430077, China; 2. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China) Abstract: By improving the structure of compressed gas energy storage(CGES) systems at high, medium and low temperatures, air and CO, were used for simulation respectively, and the system cycle efficiency, energy storage density and exergy analysis were analyzed and compared when different working fluids were used. Results show that the cycle efficiency of the high and medium temperature systems using air as working fluid is higher, while that of the low temperature system is opposite. The exergy efficiency of the system using air is higher. The system using COz as working fluid has higher energy storage density and lower overall exergy input, exergy output and exergy loss. Key words: CGES; air; CO2; cycle efficiency; energy storage density; exergy analysis 压缩气体储能（CGES)技术由于具有大规模储 度更大，具有更高的储能潜力，更容易达到临界 能的能力，并可以以相对较低的成本无缝连接到现 状态。 有的燃