氢气与天然气长输管道线路设计ASME标准对比分析.docx

·44·

标

标准规范

氢气与天然气长输管道线路设计ASME标准对比分析

蒋庆梅，张小强

(中国石油天然气管道工程有限公司，河北廊坊065000)

摘要：对ASMEB31.12—2014与ASMEB31.8—2014关于埋地长输管道线路设计部分中管材选择、管道设计、管道焊接及无损检测、管道试压、管道阀室、埋深、间距等方面进行了对比分析，得出：与天然气长输管道设计相比，氢气长输管道用钢管选材存在一定限制条件，其直管段钢管设计公式中考虑了材料性能系数的影响，热煨弯管设计方法不同，强度试压介质及试压压力值存在差别，在钢管焊前预热及焊后热处理、埋地管道最小覆土厚度、与地下其他管道和建构筑物间距及穿越公(铁)路套管要求等方面要求更严格。氢气与天然气长输管道对冷弯弯管、环焊缝无损检测、阀室设置以及严密性试压的相关要求是一致的。所以，应用现有天然气管网设施输送氢气及天然气管道转变为氢气管道时需要进行全面分析、论证，确保管道安全可靠。

关键词：氢气；天然气；长输管道；线路设计；对比分析

中图分类号：TH49;TE832;T-651文献标志码：B文章编号：1001-4837(2015)08-0044-06

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4837.2015.08.008

ContrastiveAnalysisofASMEStandardsforRouteDesignofHydrogenandNaturalGasLong-distanceTransportationPipeline

JIANGQing-mei,ZHANGXiao-qiang

(ChinaPetroleumPipelineEngineeringCorporation,Langfang065000,China)

Abstract:Contrastsweremadeaboutpipematerialselection,pipelinedesign,pipelineweldingandnonde-structivetesting,pressuretest,valves,cover,clearance,andcasingrequirementsforburiedlong-distancetransportationpipelineinASMEB31.12—2014andASMEB31.8—2014,andconclusionsareasfol-lows:comparedwiththedesignofgastransmissionpipeline,pipematerialselectionofhydrogentransmis-sionpipelinehascertainconstraints,materialperformancefactorisconsideredinthestraightpipedesignformula,hotbendsdesignmethodandpressuretestmediumandrequirementsaredifferent.Therequire-mentsforpreheatingandpostweldheattreatment,cover,clearancebetweenpipelinesandotherunder-groundstructures,andcasingunderrailroads,highways,roadsorstreets,etc.arestricterthanthatforgastransmissionpipeline.Therequirementsforcoldbends,nondestructivetesting,valvesandleaktestareconsistentwiththatforgastransmissionpipeline.Inordertoensurethesafetyandreliabilityofpipe,acomprehensiveanalysisneedtobedonewhenusingtheexistingnaturalgaspipelin