一管道钢裂纹扩展阻力曲线测试研究.pdfVIP

2013年摇 第37卷摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版)摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 Vol.37摇 No.5 摇 第5期摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 Journal of China University of Petroleum摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 摇 Oct.2013 摇 摇 文章编号:1673鄄5005(2013)05鄄0168鄄07摇 摇 摇 doi:10.3969/ j.issn.1673鄄5005.2013.05.024 一管道钢裂纹扩展阻力曲线测试研究 帅摇 健 (中国石油大学机械与储运工程学院,北京 102249) 摘要:采用多试样法测试X65和X80两种管材的R 曲线、启裂韧性及撕裂模量,对比分析R 曲线参量的塑性铰模型 法和浊 因子法。 结果表明:塑性铰模型法和基于载荷-裂纹嘴位移曲线的浊 因子法的测试结果比较接近,基于载荷- 加载线位移曲线的浊 因子法与前两种方法的差别较大;对于中等强度的X65管材,塑性铰模型法、基于载荷-裂纹嘴 位移曲线和载荷-加载线位移曲线的浊 因子法得到的R 曲线较为一致,而对高强度的X80管材,这3种方法得到的 R 曲线偏差较大,特别是啄-R 曲线的分散性较高;基于R 曲线的撕裂模量趋于稳定,展现了裂纹的稳态扩展特性。 关键词:管道钢;断裂韧性;阻力曲线;多试样法;浊 因子法;塑性铰模型 中图分类号:O346.1摇 摇 摇 文献标志码:A Study on crack growth resistance curve test of pipeline steel SHUAI Jian (College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering in China University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249,China) Abstract:TheR鄄curve aswell asfracturetoughness andtearing moduleweretestedfor X65 andX80 steel using multi鄄speci鄄 men method,inwhich the characteristic parameterswereJ鄄integral and CTOD. Plastic hinge model and浊 factor methodwere compared. Theresults show that thetest result of plastichingemodel is similar tothat of 浊 factor methodbasedonload鄄crack mouth displacement curves,but has a relative large differencewhen comparedwith thetest result of 浊 factor methodbasedon load鄄loadline displacement curves. ForX65asmidstrengthpipelinesteel,R curvesbyplastichingemodeland浊factormeth鄄 od based onload鄄crackmouthdisplacement curvesandload鄄loadlinedisplacement curves,arerelatively consistent. However, for X80 ashigh strength pipeline steel,R curves,especially 啄鄄R curves by the three methods,have a large dispersion. The tearing modulusbased on theR curvetendto be a constant,which representsthe steady propagation ch