确立行政民事合并诉讼的理性思考--由柯愈荣等诉武蛟乡政府土地发包案展开的分析.pdfVIP

摘 要 在行政争议与民事纠纷并存的案件中，因民事纠纷的解决与行政争议之间存 在交叉关系、因果联系或互为前提的，由当事人提出申请，经法院准许可以将民 事纠纷与行政争议合并在同一案件中进行审理，这就是行政民事合并诉讼制度。 行政民事合并诉讼，既是诉讼效益最大化的需要，也是解决行政争议与民事纠纷 并存的案件中矛盾冲突的需要。行政诉讼与民事诉讼保护的利益侧重点不同，两 者之间的价值冲突时而发生碰撞。确立行政民事合并诉讼制度，将行政民事交织 的案件合并在同一案件中审理，是审判实务的迫切需要。虽然我国诉讼法与司法 解释都未对行政民事合并诉讼进行具体的规定，而大陆法系和普通法系对民事行 政合并诉讼案件的处理有着不同的处理模式，但我国已有专利、商标民事纠纷中 的行政案件一并审理的先例。有基于此，本文从审判实践出发，对行政争议与民 事纠纷交织的问题进行 析研究，探讨了行政民事合并诉讼的可行性，并对行政 民事合并诉讼制度进行了程序的构建。 关键词：行政争议 民事纠纷 合并诉讼 1 Abstract The Administrative and Civil Actions Consolidation Mechanism’ is such that a civil dispute and an administrative dispute may be adjudicated in a same case, upon the application from a party, on the ground that the two disputes overlap each other, have cause-and-effect relationship or are preconditioned on each other. Such a mechanism is required for the maximization of litigation efficiency as well as for the resolution of conflicts in a case involving both administrative and civil disputes. As an administrative proceeding and a civil proceeding put different emphasis on the interests they protect, their values conflict from time to time. Therefore, the establishment of the Administrative and Civil Actions Consolidation Mechanism’ is the need called for in court practice. Although such a mechanism is not expressly prescribed in China Litigation Law nor in relevant judicial interpretations, and the modes of similar mechanism differ between continental and Anglo-American genealogies of law, some precedents already exist in China consolidating the administrative dispute into the civil litigation involving patent and trademark. Based on this, this article explores the feasibility of such a mechanism and proposes a procedure for the establishment of the mechanism after analyzin