自由市场体制下政府干涉的政治经济外文翻译.docVIP

自由市场体制下政府干涉的政治经济外文翻译.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
本科毕业设计(论文) 外 文 翻 译 原文: Political Economy of Government Intervention in the Free Market System Free Market and Market Failure The theory of laissez-faire economics is predicated on the idealized competitive model where market exchange is based on the fundamental principles of exclusion and revealed preferences (Allan, 1971), free flow of information, and self-regulating mechanisms. The theory of market failure suggests that in a situation where companies have power to fix prices or limit competition, consumers lack the information needed to select the best products, market exchanges affect people who are not party to the transaction, the structure of an industry blocks new firms from entering business (Lehne, 2006), or market allocations result in inequities in the distribution of income and wealth, when a market failure has occurred. Therefore government can put in place an appropriate institutional and regulatory framework to correct it. The nineteenth century was characterized by the “market society” that resulted from the liberal self-regulating state (Polanyi, 1957, p. 250) and by principles of economic liberalism rooted in the belief that competition provided adequate basis for the market to provide sufficient wealth without systematic state intervention (Galbraith, 1970, p. 50). The end of World War I saw the end of the market society, and classical liberalism gave way to socialist welfare concerns for growth, employment, and redistribution (Polanyi, 1957; Ruggie, 1983), as well as interventionist institutions aimed at macroeconomic stabilization for the purpose of maintaining income and employment (Gallarotti, 2000). The Great Depression of the 1930s strongly reinforced the macroeconomic interventionist posture of the state in capitalist nations due to an unprecedented social and economic crisis in terms of mass unemployment, fall in production, and social and political unrest that threatened the very survival of the capitalist world order. This “empirici

文档评论(0)

chengzhi5201 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档