南京六中2012年高考复习阶段性测试试.pptVIP

WG8 Munich May 8, 2006 Overview Introduction Importance of HMI for Warnings Guidelines for Warning Displays Standardization Assessment Procedures for Warnings Research Needs Additional Issues 1. Introduction Advanced Vehicle Safety Technologies can assist drivers in preventing crashes minimizing harm. To be effective, warnings need to lead the driver to a timely and appropriate response. 2. Importance of the  Human-Machine Interface for Warnings A WARNING SYSTEM CAN BE NO BETTER THAN ITS INTERFACE 3. Guidelines for Warning Displays Concerns Limitations with Guidelines Lack specifics e.g. “Warnings should be distinguishable” Inconsistent adoption application 4. Standardization Human Factors Benefits…. Provided in terms of increased warning effectiveness improved safety due to increased comprehension reduced confusion Good opportunity to standardize warnings Immediate hard braking for evasion of crash Immediate steering manoeuvre for evasion of crash Immediate termination of initiated action Seek awareness of situation and perform one of the above responses Immediate decision to retake control by the driver Method of conveying priority There are typically three levels of warning priority: ? Low-level - driver prepares action or decision within 10 seconds to 2 minutes; may escalate to a higher level if not acted upon Med-level - requires action or decision within 3 to 10 seconds; may escalate to high-level warning if not acted upon High-level - warning requires the driver to take immediate action or decision (0 to 3 seconds) to avoid severe injury or death. (SAE 2006 warnings subcommittee 2006; Muesthler, 2001) 5. Warnings Assessment Procedures Standard assessment procedures criteria for testing warning performance: Practical, meaningful, reliable objective Considerations: Equipment performance (sensor coverage, accuracy and reliability, detection performance) Driver-system performance (fast or timely, appropriate and s