论建筑行业挂靠关系民法调整.pdfVIP

摘 要 转包和挂靠，并列为我国建筑行业的两大热点问题。关于转包，我国法律已有 明确规定，而对于挂靠，现行法律却没有相关具体规定，导致司法实践中对该类案 件的认定和处理较为混乱。因此，研究和探讨建筑行业挂靠关系的法律调整显得尤 为重要。本文运用归纳、比较和实证分析相结合的方法，研究了建筑行业挂靠关系 的特殊性和法律性质。由于国家对建筑企业实行严格的市场准入制度，目前建筑行 业普遍存在的“挂靠”实际是以获取经济利益为目的，没有相应资质的民事主体以 其他有资质或较高资质的建筑施工企业的名义承揽工程的行为。建筑行业挂靠与内 部承包、委托代理、转包存在明显的区别。建筑行业的挂靠，实质就是“借用资质”， 违反了法律关于资质不得借用的禁止性规定，挂靠行为属于违法行为。因此，挂靠 双方签订的挂靠协议无效，以被挂靠人的名义与发包方签订的建筑施工合同无效。 但是，挂靠人与发包方以外的第三人签订的合同效力应视具体情况确定。在此基础 上，分析研究了建筑行业挂靠关系方如何承担民事责任。 关键词：建筑行业 挂靠 合同效力 民事责任 I Abstract Both subcontract and subordination are hot spots in Construction industry in China. There are laws adjusting subcontract relationships, but there is no concrete provision about subordination, so it is relatively confused to establish and handle this kind of cases in judicial practice. So, it is very important to research the law’s adjustment on subordination relationships of Construction industry. The article discusses the special characteristics subordination relationships of Construction industry by using methods of generalization, comparison and positive analysis. Because of the strict market access system on Construction industry, the subordinations of Construction industry actually are behaviors that ineligible companies manage projects in the name of other qualified Construction company in order to get economic interests. There are clear differences among the subordinations of Construction industry and internal contract, principal-agent and subcontract. In fact, the subordinations of Construction industry are qualification borrowing, and it violates the legal rules that