论传媒对司法的不当介入及其防范.pdfVIP

暨南大学硕士学位论文 摘 要 任何权力在没有监督的情况下都会被滥用，司法权也不例外。司法公正的实现离不开 传媒对司法的有效监督。传媒对司法的监督将司法权运行至于公众视野之下，及时揭露暗 箱操作和徇私枉法的行为，可以有效防止冤假错案的发生，维护司法公正。但是，由于我 国现行立法的缺失、传媒与司法的属性差异以及各自本身存在许多不足之处等原因，造成 二者在实践中的冲突不断，一个突出的表现就是，传媒对司法案件不适当的报道和评论， 侵害了司法的独立地位，甚至造成“媒体审判”的严重后果，损坏了司法公正。因此，如 何防止传媒不当地介入司法，平衡传媒与司法的关系，实现二者之间的良性互动，是关乎 新闻自由与司法独立的重大宪政问题，十分值得探索和研究。本文在充分肯定传媒监督司 法的正当性与积极效果的前提下，侧重分析传媒不当介入司法对司法独立和公正造成的负 面影响。文章将从传媒与司法二者冲突的表现以及传媒影响司法的路径的分析入手，多角 度地阐述二者产生冲突的原因，并通过借鉴其他国家的立法经验，结合我国实际情况，提 出我国防范传媒不当介入司法的对策。 关键词：传媒 司法独立 冲突 对策 I 暨南大学硕士学位论文 Abstract Any right will be abused without supervision, and judicature is no exception. Realization of judicial justice cannot do without effective supervision of media. Supervision of media on judicature will reveal judicia l power to the public, discover in time black case work and activities of bending law for personal gain, effectively prevent miscarriages and safeguard judicial justice. However, because of lack of current legislation, attribute differences between media and judicature and their specific disadvantages, conflicts between the two remain in practice. One of the prominent features is that improper reports and comments on judicial cases will infract judicial independence, and even become media trail, which damag es judicial justice. Thus, how to avoid improper intervention of media in judicature, to balance relationship between the two and to realize benign interaction are important constitutional issues, which concern freedom of the press and judicial independence and are worth studying. On premise of fully affirming legitimacy and positive effects of supervision of media on judicature, paper stresses to analyz