论善意取得适用.pdfVIP

摘 要 善意取得制度是物权法上的一项重要制度，我国《物权法》首次在立法上确定 了这一重要制度。但由于立法者比较强调法律制度的简洁，将动产善意取得和不动 产善意取得进行统一规定，这就使得该制度在适用过程中出现了一些需要详细讨论 的问题。 传统民法理论认为善意取得仅仅适用于动产物权，提出了“善意取得动产化理 论”。由于登记错误与无权处分的客观存在，突破了传统民法理论，因而确立不动产 物权善意取得成为现实的需要。赃物交易，从外观上看完全符合善意取得的构成要 件，因此，有条件地承认赃物善意取得效力是现实的必然选择。 无权处分、相对人善意、转让合同的有偿性、物权的公示是适用善意取得的必 备要件。无权处分是善意取得制度的前提。而对于“善意”的认定，应从行为人的 主体适格、客观行为表现、时间界限三个方面进行；支付合理对价是善意取得不可 缺少的一个重要条件；物权的公示，指应当登记的已经登记，不需要登记的已经交 付给受让人。 善意取得在受让人与无权处分人之间将产生物权变动的效力，在原权利人与无 权处分人之间产生债权法上的法律后果，善意取得制度相较于合同法第51条具有优 先适用的效力。 关键词 善意取得 物权法 无权处分 善意 公示 IV Abstract The good intention acquisition system is a key system of Property Law. Property Law of the state defines the system during the process of legislation for the first time. Owing to emphasis to brevity by legislator, it makes a general rule to the good intention acquisition of movable property and fixed real property, which requires further discussion during the process of appliance of the system. Traditional civil law defines that the good intention acquisition merely suits to movable property, therefore, it opposes theory of good intention acquisition of movable property. Due to existence of misregistration and unauthorized disposal, it breakdowns theory of traditional civil law, therefore, sets necessity of good intention acquisition of movable property being into reality. Theft deal, which applies with key part of composition of good intention acquisition through appearance, therefore, to admit the effect of good intention acquisition conditionally of theft is the necessary choice to reality. Unauthorized disposal, good intention of counterpart, n