- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
假释制度适用问题研究——以苏北两所监狱的实证分析为例
中文摘要
中文摘要
假释作为一项重要的刑罚执行制度,具有促进罪犯改造、实现司法救济、建
立罪犯再社会化桥梁、缓解监狱压力、节约行刑成本等功能。适用得当,将对保
障罪犯人权、实现刑罚目的发挥积极的作用。
然而,由于法律在实体和程序方面对该制度的规定和设置存在不足,该制度
在司法实践中没有被很好地适用,存在着诸多问题。一直以来,法律理论和实务
界对该制度给予了很高的关注。
本文以实证研究的方法,通过对罪犯实际被适用假释情况的有关数据统计、
访谈等,试图从该制度在实际适用中的各环节找出其存在的问题和不足,并进行
原因分析。在此基础上,拟对立法层面修改假释的实质条件规定、区分“应当假
释”和“可以假释”两种情形、调整减刑和假释的最低服刑期、细化假释撤销条
件的规定以及在实践层面完善假释适用运作机制、罪犯在服刑期间的考评机制、
假释考验期间的监督考察机制等提出自己的建议。
关键词:假释制度
实证研究 机制
完善
作
者:潘
伟
指导老师:于晓琪
I
英文摘要
假释制度适用问题研究——以苏北两所监狱的实证分析为例
Study on application of parole system
——exampling on empirical analysis of two prisons in
the north of Jiangsu Province
Abstract
Parole is an important criminal punishment method, which is designed for the
purpose of accelerating criminals rehabilitating, realizing judicial remedy, establishing
bridges for criminals’ resocialization, relieving prison pressure, economizing execution
costs. Utilized properly, the Parole system would play an active role to protect the
human rights of criminals and achieve the objectives of penalties.
However, due to insufficiency in the provisions of both substantive and procedural
laws with regard to the Parole system, it has not been appropriately used in judicial
practices, resulting in many problems pertaining thereto. For quite a long time,
professionals in both legal theoretical area and practical area have been paying lots of
attention to it.
The author is a policeman working in prisons doing penalty execution, who is
trying to find out the existing problems and insufficiencies in every step of the practices
of this system by way of statistics on the application, as well as questionnaires and
interviews. Based on the aforesaid, the author posed his own conceptualization in
respect to amending the provisions of the substantive conditions of parole on legislative
level, distinguishing between two situations called “ should be paroled” and “could be
paroled ”,detailing the provisions of the revocation conditions of parole and perfec
文档评论(0)