- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
运用外显互动式任务模式教授语法的实证研究.ppt
An Experimental Study on the Application of Explicit Interactive Task Instruction to the Teaching of English Grammar 运用外显互动式任务模式教授语法的实证研究 By Wu Fang Gannan Teachers’ College, Jiangxi, China Abstract This paper is an experimental study based on the theoretical research of explicit interactive task put forward by Dai Weidong and Ren Qingmei. The participants in the experiment were 75 first-year students who came from Chinese Department of Gan Nan Teachers’ College. The aim is to compare the teaching effect of explicit interactive task instruction and explicit instruction, interactive instruction. In the experiment, two grammar items were adopted, one is Inversion, and the other is The Present Progressive to Express Futurity. A pre-test and two later-tests were did, and according to the pre-test, 22 students were in explicit group, 22 in interactive group, 31 in explicit interactive task group (experimental group). The Z-test of the two later-tests show that explicit interactive task instruction is superior to explicit instruction, interactive instruction. It is completely identical with the proposal that structure-based interactive task be applied to improve the grammar teaching (Fotos). This paper also points out the teaching enlightenment of this experiment. Ⅰ.The Current Situation of Grammar Teaching in China There have been many methodologies throughout the ages of foreign language teaching, and many even seem to repeat themselves. This cyclical pattern of language teaching methodologies was called “the changing winds and shifting sands.” There is still a good deal of current debate on the particular approach that teachers should take in offering grammatical instruction. Four primary issues characterize this ongoing professional discussion: 1.Should grammar be presented inductively or deductively? 2. Should we use grammatical explanations and technical terminology in a CLT classroom? 3. Should grammar be taught in separate “grammar only” classes? 4.
文档评论(0)