建设工程实际施工人诉权保护 - 西安培华学院.docVIP

2014届本科生毕业论文 题 目 建设工程实际施工人诉权保护 作者姓名 陈 曦 指导教师 张 海 珠 二级学院 人文与艺术学院 专 业 法 学 学 号 1B105236（104424) 建设工程实际施工人诉权保护 摘　　要 自国民经济“九五”计划以来，建筑业逐渐成为我国经济的基础产业之一，在振兴经济方面发挥着重要作用，扮演着国民经济新的增长点的角色。然而，相对于建筑业迅猛发展之势，与建筑业市场配套的法律法规严重滞后，从而使得建筑业市场不规范现象日趋严重。转包，违法分包，挂靠经营屡见不鲜，名义承包人与实际施工人往往不一致，导致在整个建筑业市场上处于弱势群体的农民工合法权益难以保证。为此，在国家无比重视“三农”问题的大背景下，最高人民法院于2004年出台了《最高人民法院关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》（以下简称法释），其中第26条突破了合同相对性，通过赋予实际施工人向发包人的诉权，从而达到间接保护农民工合法权益的目的。然而在实践中，由于理解的偏差，往往使得该条款的司法效果大打折扣。本文将对该条款就适用范围，实际施工人范围，举证责任分配以及存在的问题进行系统的论述。 关键词：建设工程； 合同相对性； 实际施工人； 违法分包； 非法转包 Construction Project Construction to Protect His Right to Appeal Abstract Since the Nine Five plan of national economy, construction industry has become one of the basic industry of our national economy, and plays an important role in reviving the economy, as a new growth point in national economic role. However, compared to the rapid development of the construction industry trend, supporting laws and regulations and the construction industry market is seriously lagging behind, which makes the construction industry market is not standard phenomenon becomes more and more serious. Contracts, illegal subcontracting, link it to operate It is often seen. name, contractor and the actual construction people are often inconsistent, resulting in the vulnerable groups in the whole construction industry on the market it is difficult to guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of migrant workers. Therefore, the state pays great attention in background of three rural issues, the Supreme Peoples Court promulgated the interpretation of the Supreme Peoples Court on the law applicable to the construction contract dispute case in 2004 (hereinafter referred to asinter pretation), twenty-sixth of which broke the contract relativity, the right of appeal to the actual construction to the employer, so as to achieve the purpo