基于割线模量法的黄土增湿变形本构关系研究.pdfVIP

第 25 卷 第 3 期 岩石力学与工程学报 Vol.25 No.3 2006 年 3 月 Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering March ，2006 基于割线模量法的黄土增湿变形本构关系研究 1 2 2 张茂花 ，谢永利 ，刘保健 (1. 东北林业大学 土木工程学院，黑龙江 哈尔滨 150040 ；2. 长安大学 公路学院，陕西 西安 710064) 摘要：分别采用单线法和双线法对原状 Q 黄土进行增(减)湿情况下的单轴压缩试验，并利用割线模量法对试验结 3 果进行对比分析。研究结果表明，无论是双线法还是单线法，同一初始含水量下未浸水试样和浸水试样的割线模 量与压力关系曲线的斜率虽然存在一定差异，但两者差值都很小，所以可认为两者的割线模量与压力关系曲线平 行；割线模量差与初始含水量的关系曲线按指数形式进行拟合比较合理。 关键词：土力学；湿陷性黄土；增(减)湿变形；单线法；双线法；割线模量法；本构关系 中图分类号：TU 411 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1000 –6915(2006)03 –0609 –09 STUDY ON CONSTITUTIVE RELATION OF LOESS MOISTENING DEFORMATION BASED ON SECANT-MODULUS METHOD 1 2 2 ZHANG Mao-hua ，XIE Yong-li ，LIU Bao-jian (1. School of Civil Engineering ，Northeast Forestry University ，Harbin ，Heilongjiang 150040，China； 2. Highway College ，Chang ′an University ，Xi ′an ，Shaanxi 710064，China) Abstract ：Single-line method and double-line method are adopted respectively to carry out uniaxial compression tests on undisturbed loess(Q3) in the case of moistening or demoistening. By employing secant-modulus method， the experimental results from two methods are analyzed. It indicated that ，whether double-line method or single-line method，the relation curves between secant modulus and pressure for unsoaked samples and soaked samples under the same initial moisture content can be considered as parallel，although there is a little difference between the slopes of the two curves. It is reasonable to fit the relation curve between secant-modulus difference and pressure by using exponential form. Key wor