Mattias Wennstrouml;mUppsala UniversitySweden.ppt

Mattias Wennstr?m Uppsala University Sweden Outline Introduction...why MIMO?? Shannon capacity of MIMO systems The ”pipe” interpretation To exploit the MIMO channel BLAST Space Time Coding Beamforming Comparisons hardware issues Space time coding in 3G EDGE Initial Assumptions Flat fading channel (Bcoh 1/ Tsymb) Slowly fading channel (Tcoh Tsymb) nr receive and nt transmit antennas Noise limited system (no CCI) Receiver estimates the channel perfectly We consider space diversity only MIMO capacity in general The Channel Eigenvalues To Exploit the MIMO Channel Space Time Coding Orthogonal Space-time Block Codes STBC for 2 Transmit Antennas MIMO With Beamforming Comparisons... ”Take- home message”  Mattias Wennstr?m Signals Systems Group Promises of Wireless MIMO Systems Telatar, ATT 1995 Foschini, Bell Labs 1996 Tarokh, Seshadri Calderbank 1998 Release ’99 Why multiple antennas ???? Frequency and time processing are at limits Space processing is interesting because it does not increase bandwidth Adaptive Antennas interference cancellation Phased array range extension, interference reduction MIMO Systems (diversity) ”Specular” channels ”Scattering” channels outdoor indoor H11 H21 ”Classical” receive diversity = log2[1+(PT/s2)·|H|2] [bit/(Hz·s)] H = [ H11 H21] Capacity increases logarithmically with number of receive antennas... Transmit diversity / beamforming H11 H12 Cdiversity = log2(1+(PT/2s2)·|H|2) [bit/(Hz·s)] Cbeamforming = log2(1 +(PT/s2 )·|H|2) [bit/(Hz·s)] 3 dB SNR increase if transmitter knows H Capacity increases logarithmically with nt H11 H22 Multiple Input Multiple Output systems H12 H21 Cdiversity = log2det[I +(PT/2s2 )·HH?]= Where the ?i are the eigenvalues to HH? l1 l2 m=min(nr, nt) parallel channels, equal power allocated to each ”pipe” Interpretation: Receiver Transmitter H unknown at TX H known at TX Where the power distribution over ”pipes” are given