西施坡隧道浅埋段CRD法与正台阶法比选分析.pdfVIP

  • 4
  • 0
  • 约1.47万字
  • 约 8页
  • 2015-08-01 发布于湖北
  • 举报

西施坡隧道浅埋段CRD法与正台阶法比选分析.pdf

西施坡隧道浅埋段CRD法与正台阶法比选分析.pdf

35 2               Vol.35 No.2 2015 2                       Journal of Xi’an Technological University                      Feb.2015 DOI:10 .16185/ .xatu.edu.cn.2015 .02 .009 j j * CRD , , (, 710021)   :  , ,CRD、、 .:CRD ,CRD2 ;CRD 74% 83% ,;CRD 2 .6 .. :  ;CRD;; :  U455 .4         :  A :  1673‐9965(2015)02‐0135‐07 - , - , - (Schoolof Civil Engineering,Xi’an Technological University,Xi’an 710021 ,China) :  For theproblem of theoptimum selectionof tunnelexcavationmethod,thecalculationmodel of finite element mesh is built by using thefinite element method.The plasticzone distribution,tunnel displacement and stress of initial support during construction with CRD method or Bench method are analyzed respectively .Research results show :In the typical sections,theCRD method has theinfluence on theground on a larger scale,the plastic zone area of the CRD method is nearly twice much as the Bench method;Thecrown settlement andhorizontalconvergenceof theCRD methodare74% and83% of those of the Bench method,which satisfy the technical specification for construction of highway tunnel;Tensilestressproducedin directionby theCRDmethodisabout 2 .6 timeshigher thanthat by theBench method.TheBench methodis recommended to the shallowly buried tunnel excavation. :  shallow buried tunnel;CRD method;Bench method;finite element [4-6]     ,、 , (Tunnel Boring Machine,TBM) (Center Cross-Diagram,CRD)、 ,TBM 、, , [1-3] ,, , * :2014‐11‐21 :(1972‐),,,.E‐mail:459485782@ q

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档