- 4
- 0
- 约1.47万字
- 约 8页
- 2015-08-01 发布于湖北
- 举报
西施坡隧道浅埋段CRD法与正台阶法比选分析.pdf
35 2 Vol.35 No.2
2015 2 Journal of Xi’an Technological University Feb.2015
DOI:10 .16185/ .xatu.edu.cn.2015 .02 .009
j j
*
CRD
, ,
(, 710021)
: ,
,CRD、、
.:CRD
,CRD2 ;CRD
74% 83% ,;CRD
2 .6 ..
: ;CRD;;
: U455 .4 : A : 1673‐9965(2015)02‐0135‐07
- , - , -
(Schoolof Civil Engineering,Xi’an Technological University,Xi’an 710021 ,China)
: For theproblem of theoptimum selectionof tunnelexcavationmethod,thecalculationmodel
of finite element mesh is built by using thefinite element method.The plasticzone distribution,tunnel
displacement and stress of initial support during construction with CRD method or Bench method are
analyzed respectively .Research results show :In the typical sections,theCRD method has theinfluence
on theground on a larger scale,the plastic zone area of the CRD method is nearly twice much as the
Bench method;Thecrown settlement andhorizontalconvergenceof theCRD methodare74% and83%
of those of the Bench method,which satisfy the technical specification for construction of highway
tunnel;Tensilestressproducedin directionby theCRDmethodisabout 2 .6 timeshigher thanthat by
theBench method.TheBench methodis recommended to the shallowly buried tunnel excavation.
: shallow buried tunnel;CRD method;Bench method;finite element
[4-6]
,、 ,
(Tunnel Boring Machine,TBM) (Center Cross-Diagram,CRD)、
,TBM 、, ,
[1-3]
,, ,
* :2014‐11‐21
:(1972‐),,,.E‐mail:459485782@ q
原创力文档

文档评论(0)