超前镇痛对开胸术后疼痛综合征发生影响Meta分析.docVIP

超前镇痛对开胸术后疼痛综合征发生影响Meta分析.doc

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
超前镇痛对开胸术后疼痛综合征发生影响的Meta分析   作者:陶利军  作者单位:内蒙古医学院附属医院麻醉科,内蒙古 呼和浩特   【摘要】目的:对超前镇痛能否预防开胸术后疼痛综合征的发生进行系统评价。方法:计算机检索MEDLINE(1990-2006.6)、EMBASE(1989-2006.6)及中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM) (1978-2006.6),手工检索纳入试验的所有中文及外文文献及相关文献,收集所有对有关超前镇痛与开胸术后疼痛综合征的随机对照临床试验,对其逐个进行方法学质量评价,并用RevMan4.2.8进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入2个随机对照试验,99例应用超前镇痛行开胸手术的患者;均为高质量研究,Meta分析结果显示:超前镇痛组与对照组比较在随访时间内其效应间差异无统计学意义,开胸术后慢性痛合并优势比为0.51[95%CI(0.19,1.34),P=0.17]。 结论:目前无足够证据证明超前镇痛能够有效预防和降低开胸术后慢性痛的发生,尚需要更多设计严谨、方法科学的高质量随机对照试验。   【关键词】 超前镇痛;疼痛;胸部手术;Meta分析   A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Preemptive Analgesia on the Post-thoracotomy Pain Syndrome  TAO Lijun  (Department of Anaesthesia, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical College, Huhehot 010050,China)   Abstract Objective:To examine whether preemptive analgesia can prevent the post-thoractomy pain syndrome.Methods: Using the methods of The Cochrane Collaboration, a systematic review of the relevant randomized controll trials (RCTs) of pre-emptive analgesia for chronic post-thoracotomy pain was performed.The literature related to trials was collected form MEDLINE(1990-2006.6), EMBASE(1989-2006.6), CBM (1978-2006.6), and all articles in Chinese and English involved in trails were handsearched.The quality of literature was reviewed, and data were extracted by two reviewers independently.Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 4.2 software.Results: Two RCTs involving 99 patients were included and all were of high methodological quality according to Jadad scale(the Jadad score3).Meta-analysis indicated that no statistical difference was detected between preemptive analgesia group and the controll groups in effectiveness in the follow-up time, with OR 0.51 [95%CI(0.19,1.34)P=0.17].Conclusions: Comparing preemptive analgesia with the controlled, current evidence can not evaluate whether preemptive analgesia is significantly effective for chronic post-thoracotomy pain, more RCTs of high methodological quality and better techniques are required.   Key words Pre

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

feiyang66 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档