3种用药方案治疗恶性疟疾的最小成本分析.pdf

StraitPharmaceuticalVol23No．42011 JournaI ·药物经济学· 3种用药方案治疗恶性疟疾的最小成本分析 胡爱虹．李小明，王建化(浙江湖州市第一人民医院湖州313000) 摘要：目的对比分析3种不同用药方案治疗恙性疟疾的置小成畚。方j法选择性地将无其他并发症的1440例恶性疟疾患者蓝机分为A组 3组 (青蔫琥酯片加阿莫地喹片)、B组(双氢青蔫素哌喹片)、c组(复方磷酸蓁酚喹片)．运用药物经济学方法进行回顾性分析。结果A、B、c 本置低．t为经济。 关键词：焉性疟疾；青蒿素类药物；最小成本分析 中囝分类号：F404．4文献标识码：B文章缠号：1006-3765(2011)-04．0199-03 inthe of Cost-minimizationon3KindsofMedicinesTreatment Analysis malaria falciparum HM The Jian-hua(HuzhouFirst 313000，China) Ai—hong。LIXiao-ming，WANG People。sHospital，Huzhou ABSTRACT：OBJECTIⅦToand theminimumCOStofthreekindsofdifferentinthe compareanalyze drugs treatmentof malaria．METHODS1440oasesof malaria withoutother falciparum falciparumpatients complica- tionswere dividedinto combination randomly groupA(Artesunate+AmodiaquineAntimalarial)。groupB(Dihy— droartemisininand Piperaquinephosphatetablets)。groupC(CompoundNaphthoquinePhosphate 3 economicmethodsto Effecti,zerateofA，B。C were analyzedretrospectively．RESULTS group were 3 wereindividualcaseswasrelative— 98．75％、98．33％、98．54％．costs 45．8、48．7、24yuan．Ingroups，there mild andASTtransientmildincreaseandotheradverse Returnedto Iy nausea，Upsetstomach，AIJ reactions；and with are110 normalafter theothertwo stopping．CONCLUSIONCompared groups．theresignificant in inthree C