Published as “Why Economies Grow the Way They Do” Canadian Business Economics, SpringSumm.pdfVIP

Published as “Why Economies Grow the Way They Do” Canadian Business Economics, SpringSumm.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共21页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Published as “Why Economies Grow the Way They Do” Canadian Business Economics, SpringSumm

November 30, 1997 [2.3+] Determinants of Long Term Growth Jeffrey A. Frankel, Member, U.S. Council of Economic Advisers Background Paper for the Morning Session of the Meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Economic Advisers, Vancouver, Canada, November 20, 1997 Published as “Why Economies Grow the Way They Do” Canadian Business Economics, Spring/Summer 1998 1 Introduction 1.1 The last 20 years have seen wide-ranging research, both theoretical and empirical, on the determinants of long term growth. “Old growth models” of closed economies have given way to “new growth models” of open economies in concert with “new trade” theories. Facilitated by the availability of data that compare income levels across countries in real terms, econometricians have been able to study what factors tend to be associated with more rapid growth. 1.2 The resurgence in research is partly the result of interest in the explanation of the rapid growth in many East Asian economies. The record of growth in this part of the world had been so spectacular, at least until recently, that it was claimed as supporting evidence by both sides in each of three debates (at least). First is the debate on whether the East Asians success is proof of the superiority of protectionist policies on the one hand, or of outward-oriented policies on the other. Second is the broad debate whether the East Asian phenomenon is evidence of the virtues of government intervention in general, or of laissez-faire market-oriented policies.1 Third is the debate over whether the statistics support growth based on simple accumulation of the factors of production (labor, education, and especially physical capital), or growth based on improvements in technology and efficiency (measured as an increase in total factor productivity, or the So

文档评论(0)

wannian118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档