《Effectiveness of Knowledge Translation Interventions to Improve Cancer Pain Management》.pdf

《Effectiveness of Knowledge Translation Interventions to Improve Cancer Pain Management》.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共25页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
《Effectiveness of Knowledge Translation Interventions to Improve Cancer Pain Management》.pdf

Vol. 41 No. 5 May 2011 Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 915 Review Article Effectiveness of Knowledge Translation Interventions to Improve Cancer Pain Management Greta G. Cummings, RN, PhD, Susan Armijo Olivo, PhD, Patricia D. Biondo, PhD, € Carla R. Stiles, RN, BN, Ozden Yurtseven, MSc, Robin L. Fainsinger, MBChB, LMCC, CCFP, and Neil A. Hagen, MD, FRCPC ¨ CLEAR Outcomes Research Program (G.G.C., O.Y.), Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta; Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine (S.A.O.), University of Alberta; and Division of Palliative Care Medicine and Department of Oncology (R.L.F.), University of Alberta, Edmonton; Grey Nuns Hospital (R.L.F.), Edmonton; and Alberta Health Services Cancer Care (P.D.B., C.R.S., N.A.H.), Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, and Departments of Oncology, Clinical Neurosciences and Medicine (N.A.H.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Abstract Context. Cancer pain is prevalent, yet patients do not receive best care despite widely available evidence. Although national cancer control policies call for education, effectiveness of such programs is unclear and best practices are not well defined. Objectives. To examine existing evidence on whether knowledge translation (KT) interventions targeting health care providers, patients, and caregivers improve cancer pain outcomes. Methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to evaluate primary studies that examined effects of KT interventions on providers and patients. Results. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies reported interventions targeting health care providers, four focused on patients or their families, one study examined patients and their significant others, and 16 studies examined patients only. Seven quantitative comparisons measured the st

文档评论(0)

wgvi + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档