Wolff - Scanlon On Social and Material Inequality英文资料.docVIP

Wolff - Scanlon On Social and Material Inequality英文资料.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Scanlon On Social and Material Inequality Jonathan Wolff Dept of Philosophy UCL 1. Background and influence There is no doubt that Tim Scanlon has been an extremely influential figure in the recent development of egalitarian theory. His work has been cited in many of the leading contributions, and it is also clear that he has had an influence through discussions and communication with many of the most influential egalitarian theorists. Yet I think it is fair to say that when surveying the current debate, Scanlon’s position is not easy to identify. Whereas others have a view with a distinctive descriptive name Scanlon’s contribution has not (yet) been of this type. This, I’m sure, reflects an admirable preference for truth over brand recognition, but it will be worthwhile to see what can be constructed from some of his writings. 2. Equality and ‘Preference and Urgency’ Scanlon’s first major contribution to the debate was his 1975 paper ‘Preference and Urgency’, published in the Journal of Philosophy as a paper presented in an APA symposium on equality, with replies at the conference, but as far as I know unpublished, from Milton Fisk and Gerarld McCullum (Scanlon, 1975). Scanlon’s seminal contribution was to point out the distinction between subjective theories of well-being, such as hedonistic or preference satisfaction theories, that assess an individual’s well-being from the point of view of the person under consideration, and objective theories which provide accounts of well-being that are independent (to some degree) of the person’s tastes and preferences. Furthermore Scanlon suggests that in recognizing claims and making decisions about the use of social resources we tend to use objective accounts. The main argument for this is based on the famous example of a religious person who would prefer to build a monument to his god rather than eat, yet Scanlon plausibly claims that as a society we are much more likely to feel the weight of the urgent need for food, rat

文档评论(0)

小小紫色星 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档