《How to Revise a Research Paper and Respond to Reviewers》.ppt

《How to Revise a Research Paper and Respond to Reviewers》.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共64页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
《How to Revise a Research Paper and Respond to Reviewers》.ppt

How to be a Good Reviewer Evaluate the paper honestly, objectively, and critically Disclose any potential conflicts of interest Identify areas in which you are not an expert Write constructive and helpful reviews Maintain confidentiality [Benos et al., 2003] Positive Review Negative Review Reviewer’s Average Score on 10+ Papers Number of Reviewers Assassins Demoters Zealots Pushovers Mainstream Odds of Getting a Harsh Reviewer Positive Review Negative Review Reviewer’s Average Score Probability of Reviewer harsh reviewers Odds of Getting a Harsh Reviewer Digesting the Reviews Four-step process: Read the reviews once, and then file them in a safe location Don’t think about the reviews for at least a week (instead go skiing, golfing, etc.) Read the reviews again Discuss the reviews with your co-authors and create a plan-of-attack Outline Understanding the review process Digesting the reviews Revising your paper Communicating your revisions to the reviewers and editor Conclusions Deciding What to Change You must address all comments You can’t pick-and-choose which comments to address Even minor comments need to be addressed Address does not always mean change You and your co-authors should decide what to change, and what to defend Often, changing is the easiest route (demonstrates openness to suggestions) Deciding What to Change Change does not always mean revamp Easy changes include: Rewording Adding extra references Adding an extra paragraph, table, or figure Adding an appendix More difficult changes include: Modifying your central hypothesis Modifying your main algorithm Redoing an experiment Deciding What to Change Always change technical errors It’s the reviewer’s job to find these Even minor errors can cast doubt Always change errors in references Skilled reviewers know the history better than newer authors You don’t want to get off on the wrong foot with experts in the field by not citing the correct papers in the correct order Deciding What to Change Always cha

文档评论(0)

wfkm + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档