Price–ElasticityofEnergyDemandABibliography.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Price–ElasticityofEnergyDemandABibliography.doc

Price-Elasticity of Energy Demand A Bibliography By Gar W. Lipow This bibliography is a small sample of the thousands of papers written on energy elasticity and elasticity theory in general. Much of it is drawn from an extensive bibliography being prepared by Carol Dahl, Professor/Director, Petroleum Economics Management, Colorado School of Mines. From this material I have drawn one technical and two broader conclusions. Technically, any elasticity value is both imprecise and uncertain. To begin with elasticities vary — across economic sector, fuels, type of economy, and time. Small homogenous samples cannot perfectly represent the larger population and sometimes lead to impossible results (such as getting the sign wrong). Heterogeneity tends to creep into large samples, and aggregating heterogeneous data tends to bias elasticity estimates upward, due to demand changes in response to factors correlated with, but not related to, price changes. These include income, capital stocks, and demand for the goods and services the energy was consumed to provide. (According to the extensive literature on aggregation bias, that is a problem for demand functions in general, and production functions as well, to some extent.) Individual studies tend to have either broad confidence intervals or low confidence levels, or both. Too often, literature reviews and meta-analysis give confidence intervals that are too broad to be useful, like -0.15 to -0.8. While discarding outliers can help narrow confidence intervals, even those results are often frustratingly imprecise. There is no consensus among economists as to mathematical models that can compensate for these data limitations. Nevertheless, some literature reviews and meta-analyses that have compared competing methodologies have found similar results across multiple data sets. That is, methods A and B may produce different results against data set Q, but similar results when applied to data sets Q-Z. However not all meta-analyses f

文档评论(0)

***** + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档